Back

Reproducibility Of 7T MRI Measurements Of The Susceptibility And Volume Of Hippocampal Subfields

Adeyemi, O. F.; Mougin, O.; Gowland, P. A.; Rua, C.; Rodgers, C.; Hosseini, A. A.; Bowtell, R.

2026-06-22 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.15.26355711 medRxiv
Show abstract

PURPOSE: The UK7T travelling head dataset was used to characterise the reproducibility of 7T measurements of the susceptibility of the hippocampal subfields, focusing on the Cornu Ammonis (CA1, CA2 and CA3), dentate gyrus (DG), subiculum (SUB), tail of the hippocampus (TAIL) and entorhinal cortex (ERC). METHODS: Susceptibility maps were created from whole-brain 3D single-echo GRE data (TE=20 ms; 0.7 mm isotropic resolution) using Multi-Scale Dipole Inversion. Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) was applied to high resolution T1- and T2-weighted images for segmentation. The mean magnetic susceptibility and volume of hippocampal subfields was evaluated in 50 data sets, comprising 5 repeat acquisitions on 10 healthy participants (age 32 + or -6 years; 3 female). RESULTS: Averaging over subjects, susceptibility values spanned an 18ppb range over the hippocampus (ranging from -13.3ppb in DG to 4.7ppb in ERC). Susceptibility values in the larger hippocampal subfields showed a consistent pattern of variation across subjects, being generally more positive in ERC and SUB than in CA1 and more positive in CA1 than in DG and TAIL. The standard deviation of subfield susceptibilities over subjects ranged from 8.2ppb in the TAIL to 1.7ppb in CA1, and the average standard deviation across repeated measurements, which ranges from 1.7 to 4 ppb, was less than half of the inter-participant standard deviation in all subfields. Susceptibility values in the smaller subfields (CA2 and CA3) were more variable, but ICC(2,k) values for all subfields were >0.82. CONCLUSION: The reported data characterises the variation and reproducibility of hippocampal subfield susceptibility measurements at 7T.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.0%
2
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.0%
5
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.4%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
9
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
11
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Brain Research Bulletin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
22
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%