Reproducibility Of 7T MRI Measurements Of The Susceptibility And Volume Of Hippocampal Subfields
Adeyemi, O. F.; Mougin, O.; Gowland, P. A.; Rua, C.; Rodgers, C.; Hosseini, A. A.; Bowtell, R.
Show abstract
PURPOSE: The UK7T travelling head dataset was used to characterise the reproducibility of 7T measurements of the susceptibility of the hippocampal subfields, focusing on the Cornu Ammonis (CA1, CA2 and CA3), dentate gyrus (DG), subiculum (SUB), tail of the hippocampus (TAIL) and entorhinal cortex (ERC). METHODS: Susceptibility maps were created from whole-brain 3D single-echo GRE data (TE=20 ms; 0.7 mm isotropic resolution) using Multi-Scale Dipole Inversion. Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Subfields (ASHS) was applied to high resolution T1- and T2-weighted images for segmentation. The mean magnetic susceptibility and volume of hippocampal subfields was evaluated in 50 data sets, comprising 5 repeat acquisitions on 10 healthy participants (age 32 + or -6 years; 3 female). RESULTS: Averaging over subjects, susceptibility values spanned an 18ppb range over the hippocampus (ranging from -13.3ppb in DG to 4.7ppb in ERC). Susceptibility values in the larger hippocampal subfields showed a consistent pattern of variation across subjects, being generally more positive in ERC and SUB than in CA1 and more positive in CA1 than in DG and TAIL. The standard deviation of subfield susceptibilities over subjects ranged from 8.2ppb in the TAIL to 1.7ppb in CA1, and the average standard deviation across repeated measurements, which ranges from 1.7 to 4 ppb, was less than half of the inter-participant standard deviation in all subfields. Susceptibility values in the smaller subfields (CA2 and CA3) were more variable, but ICC(2,k) values for all subfields were >0.82. CONCLUSION: The reported data characterises the variation and reproducibility of hippocampal subfield susceptibility measurements at 7T.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-centre, multi-vendor reproducibility of 7T QSM and R2* in the human brain: results from the UK7T study 94%
- High-Resolution Magnetization-Transfer Imaging of Post-Mortem Marmoset Brain: Comparisons with Relaxometry and Histology 94%
- Effects of MP2RAGE B1+ sensitivity on inter-site T1 reproducibility and morphometry at 7T 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinguishing microgliosis and tau deposition in the mouse brain using paramagnetic and diamagnetic susceptibility source separation 96%
- The Spatial Patterns and Determinants of Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulation in the Human Brain 96%
- Hippocampal subfields and their neocortical interactions during autobiographical memory 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo magnetization transfer ratio and saturation index in mice at 9.4 Tesla 96%
- 'Pscore' - A Novel Percentile-Based Metric to Accurately Assess Individual Deviations in Non-Gaussian Distributions of Quantitative MRI Metrics 94%
- Unchanged Early Diffusion Tensor Imaging Along Perivascular Space Index After Amyloid-Targeting Disease-Modifying Therapy in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Preliminary Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of different iron forms in the aceruloplasminemia brain to explore iron-related neurodegeneration 94%
- Fully Automated Detection of Paramagnetic Rims in Multiple Sclerosis Lesions on 3T Susceptibility-Based MR Imaging 94%
- Portable, Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sensitively Detects and Accurately Quantifies Multiple Sclerosis Lesions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased Brain Volumetric Measurement Precision from Multi-Site 3D T1-weighted 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging by Correcting Geometric Distortions 95%
- Brain Iron Imaging Markers in the Presence of White Matter Hyperintensities 95%
- Influence of preprocessing, distortion correction and cardiac triggering on the quality of diffusion MR images of spinal cord 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.