Trust as a Hidden Driver of Epidemic Dynamics: A Missing Parameter in Compartmental Disease Transmission Models
Zapf, A. J.; Dewey, G.; Ognyanova, K.; Baum, M.; Hanage, W. P.; Lipsitch, M.; Uslu, A. A.; Druckman, J. N.; Perlis, R.; Lazer, D.; Santillana, M.
Show abstract
Compartmental models of infectious disease transmission make assumptions about human behaviors. Specifically, they parameterize interactions across population groups, assumed to have distinct epidemiologically-relevant behavioral patterns, primarily through contact matrices stratified by demographic variables such as age, gender, or socioeconomic status. Although such demographic characteristics are readily measurable, they may inadequately capture the social and psychological forces that govern protective behaviors. Drawing on 20 waves of a national survey conducted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, we show that institutional trust - particularly trust in public health agencies, physicians, and hospitals - is a dominant predictor of protective behavior adoption. For mask wearing during periods of strongest pandemic activity, for example, institutional trust explains more behavioral variance across population groups than age, income, education, and partisan affiliation combined. In unadjusted analyses, the difference in protective behavior adoption between individuals with the highest and lowest trust in the CDC was four- to six-fold larger than the corresponding differences by age, income, or educational attainment, and exceeded the difference between Democratic and Republican respondents. This association was institutionally specific (e.g., the relationship attenuates for trust in banks), and behaviorally specific (e.g., trust in the CDC is associated with protective behaviors but not visiting a doctor). The latter suggests that trust modifies voluntary compliance with public health recommendations rather than access to or use of healthcare. We conclude that compartmental models of disease transmission would be substantially improved by incorporating institutional trust as a stratifying variable. We additionally offer a trust-integrated mathematical modeling framework and recommendations for the data infrastructure needed for its implementation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of unequal testing on vaccine effectiveness estimates across two study designs: a simulation study 95%
- Strength and durability of indirect protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection through vaccine and infection-acquired immunity 95%
- Maternal pertussis immunization and the blunting of routine vaccine effectiveness: A meta-analysis and modeling study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 correlates of protection from infection against variants of concern 93%
- Doctors and Nurses Social Media Ads Reduced Holiday Travel and COVID-19 infections: A cluster randomized controlled trial in 13 States 93%
- Infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections and reinfections during the Omicron wave 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.