Reporting patterns of adverse drug withdrawal events using individual case safety reports in United States and European databases
Khan, Z.; Doherty, A. S.; McCarthy, C.; Dalton, K.; Jungo, K. T.; Reeve, E.; Moriarty, F.
Show abstract
Introduction: Adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs) are a key safety concern with deprescribing but are infrequently reported in trials. Although pharmacovigilance systems have advanced our understanding of medication-related harms, it is unclear how extensively these systems have been used for ADWEs. Objectives: To examine the reporting patterns of ADWEs for all drugs recorded in United States and European pharmacovigilance databases between 2004 and 2023. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using two pharmacovigilance databases, the publicly available FDA-FAERS dataset and EMA-EV Level 2A (individual-level) dataset. ADWE cases were identified using relevant MedDRA preferred terms. Data on patient characteristics, reporter type, drugs, indication, ADWE outcomes, dechallenge/rechallenge, seriousness criteria, time to onset, duration, and causality were summarised. Results: A total of 158,505 ADWE reports were analysed (FDA-FAERS: 145,514; EMA-EV: 12,987), with mean ages of 46.1 (FDA; 55.3% female) and 45.5 years (EMA; 57.1% female). The frequently reported drug classes were opioids (FDA: oxycodone, 29.8%; EMA: buprenorphine, 19%), antidepressants (FDA: duloxetine, 32%; EMA: venlafaxine, 25.9%) and gabapentinoids (FDA: pregabalin, 6.7%; EMA: pregabalin, 6.0%). The most common adverse outcomes were other serious medical conditions (FDA=63.9%; EMA=46.0%), hospitalisation (FDA=15.9%; EMA=28.3%), and disability (FDA=13.3%; EMA=6.2%) and these outcomes varied significantly based on sex and age group (p<0.05). Conclusions: This study provides novel evidence of reporting patterns and characteristics of ADWEs across drugs in pharmacovigilance data. These findings emphasise that adverse drug reaction reporting systems need to accommodate ADWEs (i.e., clarity on terminologies, dechallenge/rechallenge, causality assessment) to effectively capture ADWE-related data to support evidence-based deprescribing practices for better patient safety
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 96%
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Antihypertensive Medication Change: A Quantitative Study Using Social Media 94%
- Preventable deaths involving medicines in England and Wales, 2013-22: a systematic case series of coroners’ reports 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 92%
- Medication Clusters at Hospital Discharge and Risk of Adverse Drug Events at 30-days Post-Discharge: A Population-based Cohort Study of Older Adults 92%
- Preclinical Efficacy in Investigator’s Brochures: Stakeholders’ views on measures to improve Completeness and Robustness 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse drug reactions associated with the use of biological agents 94%
- A large Australian longitudinal cohort registry demonstrates sustained safety and efficacy of oral medicinal cannabis for at least two years 94%
- Pharmacotherapy, drug-drug interactions and potentially inappropriate medication in depressive disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world observation on response to cholinesterase inhibitors or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors prescribed to outpatients with dementia using electronic medical records 93%
- Reported Drug Spectrum and Disproportionality Signals for Malignant Neoplasm Progression in FAERS: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study 93%
- Assessment of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine Safety Profiles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.