The biological clock of multimorbidity: temporal dynamics of disease co-occurrence in primary care
Sanchez-Valle, J.; Zambrana, C.; Navarro-Martinez, A.; Costa, F. X.; Rocha, L. M.; Cirillo, D.; Violan, C.; Valencia, A.
Show abstract
Multimorbidity is the dominant clinical reality of primary care, yet the temporal dynamics governing when and how persistent comorbidity associations emerge remain poorly characterised. Most large-scale comorbidity studies adopt a single observation window after an index diagnosis, implicitly assuming that associations detectable at one year are equally detectable at five. Using 11 years of electronic health records from 5,821,197 individuals in Catalan primary care, we applied a matched cohort design across nine complementary follow-up windows, five cumulative (0-1 to 0-5 years) and four conditional (1-2 to 4-5 years), to 1,315 index diseases, identifying 144,030 significant directed comorbidity associations in the five-year network. We found that 60.1% of these associations required at least three years of follow-up and were undetectable in shorter-window analyses, demonstrating that observation window length is a primary determinant of which comorbidities can be observed. To organise this temporal heterogeneity, we introduce the biological clock of multimorbidity: a two-dimensional framework that positions ICD-10 disease categories according to their rates of cumulative signal attenuation and the persistence of conditional risk. This framework identifies four reproducible temporal patterns (episodic, chronic stable, chronic progressive, and transient-persistent) that are robust under bootstrap resampling, leave-one-disease-out sensitivity analysis, and alternative clustering approaches. The biological clock is systematically modulated by sex, with Blood/Immune and Musculoskeletal disorders showing the largest sex differences in temporal dynamics. Network analysis identified 19 disease "initiators" that generate broad downstream comorbidity burdens and 21 "sinks" representing convergent endpoints of multiple disease trajectories. Comparison with hospital-based Danish data from 6,909,676 individuals showed that shared associations were 2.7-fold enriched over chance expectation (hypergeometric test, p<10-300) and showed moderate concordance of effect sizes (Spearman {rho}=0.460), confirming that the comorbidity structure identified here reflects genuine, generalisable signal; nonetheless, only 3.6% of primary care associations were replicated in the hospital network, indicating that the two settings capture largely complementary segments of the disease co-occurrence landscape. Together, these findings establish the observation window length as a principal design parameter in EHR-based multimorbidity research and the biological clock as a framework for understanding how and over what timescale disease associations emerge, persist, and resolve.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneous metabolomic aging across the same age and prediction of health outcome 91%
- M2 Macrophages are Major Mediators of Germline Risk of Endometriosis and Explain Pleiotropy with Comorbid Traits 90%
- Distinct stress-dependent signatures of cellular and extracellular tRNA-derived small RNAs (tDRs) 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Complex patterns of multimorbidity associated with severe COVID-19 and Long COVID 96%
- Sex-specific transcriptome similarity networks elucidate comorbidity relationships 94%
- The Interpretable Multimodal Machine Learning (IMML) framework reveals pathological signatures of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting hospital-onset COVID-19 infections using dynamic networks of patient contacts: an observational study 93%
- Understanding COVID-19 trajectories from a nationwide linked electronic health record cohort of 56 million people: phenotypes, severity, waves & vaccination 92%
- Anosmia and other SARS-CoV-2 positive test-associated symptoms, across three national, digital surveillance platforms as the COVID-19 pandemic and response unfolded: an observation study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.