Back

Aberrations in stromal signaling, muscle contractility and epithelial architecture underlie poor embryo-implantation outcomes after murine ovarian stimulation

Kumar, H.;Madhavan, M.;Zou, L.;Chen, C.;Yoder, R.;Burns, G.;Paul, E.;Douglas, N.;Arora, R.

2026-06-17 Developmental Biology
10.64898/2026.06.14.732145 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ovarian stimulation is widely used in assisted reproductive technologies, yet its effects on uterine architecture and embryo implantation remain poorly understood. Using a mouse model, we show that ovarian stimulation or superovulation disrupts pre-implantation luminal epithelial folding and induces aberrant smooth muscle structure and contractile function. These structural defects result in embryo trapping within aberrant longitudinal folds, impaired implantation chamber formation, misalignment of the embryo-uterine axis, and subsequent embryo loss. These ovarian stimulation effects were reversible after rest and restoration of normal estrus cycling. Transcriptomic analysis suggests widespread disruption in the stroma and immune compartments of the stimulated uteri. Pathway analysis revealed significant disruption of stromal extracellular matrix and enhanced probability of stroma-immune communication via collagen signaling. Platelet derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) expression was elevated in both the stroma and smooth muscle of the stimulated uteri. Short-term pharmacological inhibition of PDGFRA in the stimulated uteri prior to implantation fully restored epithelial fold transition and implantation chamber formation and partially restored smooth muscle architecture and contractility. Importantly, PDGFRA protein was also elevated in endometrial biopsies from women undergoing ovarian stimulation when compared to natural cycle biopsies. Together, this study establishes muscle contractions and stromal and smooth muscle PDGFRA signaling as novel non-cell autonomous regulators of uterine epithelial architecture critical for embryo implantation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
2
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.2%
3
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 12%
8.1%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
5.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.5%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.3%
11
Molecular Human Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
Endocrinology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.0%
14
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.8%
17
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
18
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
20
Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
23
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%