Uncovering Sex Differences in the Drosophila Ventral Nerve Cord Through Connectome Alignment
Matsliah, A.; Salmon, C. K.; Bates, A. S.; Yang, H. H.; Lee, D. D.; Saul, L. K.; Silverman, B.; Gager, J.; Yu, S.-C.; Willie, K. P.; Burke, A. T.; Willie, R.; Bland, D.; Sorek, M.; David, C.; Sterling, A. R.; The BANC-FlyWire Consortium, ; Lee, W.-C. A.; Seung, H. S.; Murthy, M.
Show abstract
There are now multiple Drosophila connectomes available, comprising both its brain and spinal cord - comparing these connectomes requires first classifying neurons into cell types. Existing approaches for cell typing typically require extensive manual curation. Here we present a new method that automatically aligns connectomes via network topology alone. Using two complete male ventral nerve cord (VNC) connectomes as references, we assign cell types to ~13,000 neurons intrinsic to the female VNC, and automatically identify sex-specific and sexually dimorphic cell types. We not only provide a comprehensive census of cell types across male and female nerve cords, but we uncover connectivity differences that underlie differences in function. We focus on circuits underlying song production in males and oviposition behaviors in females, and investigate the counterparts of these circuits across sexes. Our automated methods and analyses provide insights into sex differences in circuits that connect the brain and body, and pave the way for comparative connectomics at scale.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The spinal premotor network driving scratching flexor and extensor alternation 95%
- Topographic connectivity and cellular profiling reveal detailed input pathways and functionally distinct cell types in the subthalamic nucleus 95%
- Inhibitory control of synaptic signals preceding motor action in mouse frontal cortex 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.