Back

A Structural Principle for Macroscopic Neural Dynamics Correlations

Wu, Q.; Wen, Q.; Liu, C.

2026-06-17 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.14.729168 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A central question in neuroscience is how the brains structural connectivity gives rise to its emergent, correlated dynamics. These large-scale dynamical correlations underlie functional networks that support cognitive functions. Here, we identify coupling correlation--the similarity between the input connectivity profiles of brain regions--as a key structural determinant of macroscopic neural dynamical correlation. Using dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) and numerical simulations of random neural network models, we demonstrate that coupling correlation quantitatively governs dynamical correlation. The functional form of this structure-function mapping is dictated by the eigenvalue spectrum of the coupling correlation matrix: networks with bulk eigenspectra exhibit an exact linear relationship, whereas biologically plausible long-tailed spectra yield an approximately linear mapping except when the magnitude of coupling correlation approaches unity. Particularly, a long-tailed spectrum is necessary to reproduce the appropriate magnitude and size-invariance of coupling correlations observed in empirical data, thereby sustaining non-vanishing dynamical correlations that may support brain function in large systems. The theoretical prediction of approximate linearity is consistently validated using empirical datasets that include both structural coupling and neural dynamics in humans, mice, and Drosophila. Together, these results provide a mechanistic and quantitative framework linking macroscopic brain network structure to emergent neural dynamics--an essential step toward a theory of structure-function relationship in the brain. Significance StatementHow the brains wiring gives rise to its coordinated activity is a fundamental unsolved problem in neuroscience. Prior work has identified correlations between structural and functional connectivity, but these relationships lacked a mechanistic, first-principles explanation. Here, we derive an analytical framework using Dynamical Mean-Field Theory and random neural network models to show that a single structural statistic--coupling correlation, the similarity between the input connectivity profiles of brain regions--linearly and causally determines the magnitude of correlated neural dynamics. We further show that a long-tailed eigenvalue spectrum in biological structural connectivity is necessary to sustain the strong, size-invariant functional correlations observed across species. Validated in humans, mice, and Drosophila using multiple imaging and connectome modalities, this principle may provide a quantitative bridge between structural connectomics and emergent brain dynamics, with implications extending to a broad class of complex networked systems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
18.8%
2
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.0%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.0%
5
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
9
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.2%
11
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
13
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
17
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
23
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%