ProtAff: Protein Binding Affinity Prediction via LoRA-Finetuned ESM-2
Chu, L.-S.; Vogt, J.; Chungyoun, M.; Gray, J. J.
Show abstract
Predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein interactions remains a central challenge in computational biology. Structure prediction models such as AlphaFold3 (AF3) and Boltz-2 can produce high-quality docking poses, and their confidence scores indicate structure quality, but these same scores fail to rank binding affinity among confirmed binders. Here we present ProtAff, a sequence-only affinity prediction model built on ESM-2 (650M parameters) with low-rank adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning and a cross-attention module. ProtAff is trained using a margin ranking loss on 362,567 affinity measurements spanning 20 heterogeneous data sources, and we removed all training samples whose target sequence exceeds 50% similarity to the test target EGFR. On the AdaptyvBio EGFR benchmark (N =55), ProtAff achieves a Spearman correlation coefficient{rho} = 0.413, outperforming the best AF3 metric ({rho} = 0.054), the best Boltz-2 metric ({rho} = -0.046), and ML-based predictors MINT ({rho} = 0.242) and CrossAffinity ({rho} = 0.216). Applied to the AdaptyvBio Nipah virus binder design competition, a pipeline incorporating ProtAff for affinity ranking produced a design with KD = 0.132 nM (2 of 5 designs confirmed binding), a 2.8-fold improvement over the competition winner. On a cross-target discrimination benchmark of 91 VHH-antigen crystal structures, ProtAff underperforms structural methods for distinguishing cognate from non-cognate pairings, indicating that sequence-based affinity models are effective for within-target ranking but not for cross-target specificity.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond the Leaderboard: Leveraging Predictive Modeling for Protein-Ligand Insights and Discovery 96%
- Deep Local Analysis evaluates protein docking conformations with locally oriented cubes 96%
- Deep Local Analysis deconstructs protein-protein interfaces and accurately estimates binding affinity changes upon mutation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- AlphaBind, a Domain-Specific Model to Predict and Optimize Antibody-Antigen Binding Affinity 95%
- AbDesign: Database of point mutants of antibodies with associated structures reveals poor generalization of binding predictions from machine learning models. 95%
- Towards generalizable prediction of antibody thermostability using machine learning on sequence and structure features 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DynamicGT: a dynamic-aware geometric transformer model to predict protein binding interfaces in flexible and disordered regions 96%
- Sequence-based prediction of protein-protein interactions: a structure-aware interpretable deep learning model 95%
- FlowDesign: Improved Design of Antibody CDRs Through Flow Matching and Better Prior Distributions 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.