Back

FENNEC: Fine-Tuned Ensemble Neural Networks Accelerate Chemically Modified siRNA Design and Screening

Larsen, A. W.; Butnaru, D.; Braun, J.; Rotrattanadumrong, R.; Berninger, P.; Yonchev, D.; Gagneur, J.; Marsico, A.

2026-06-14 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.13.732049 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) are a clinically validated therapeutic modality, yet designing potent chemically modified siRNAs remains a costly and iterative process, limited by scarce public data. Computational prediction of siRNA efficacy is therefore essential for rational design and accelerated preclinical development. However, despite the critical role of chemical modifications in therapeutic performance, current state-of-the-art machine learning methods either are not designed to model the chemical diversity of therapeutic siRNAs, or exhibit poor generalization performance. Here, we present FENNEC (Fine-Tuned Ensemble of Neural Networks for siRNA Efficiency Characterization), a machine-learning framework for predicting siRNA activity across chemically diverse design spaces. To support this effort, we curated the largest patent-derived dataset to date of chemically modified siRNAs from 42 patents using OCR-based table extraction and stringent filtering. FENNEC combines temporal convolutional networks with thermodynamic descriptors, experimental covariates, and embeddings from RNA foundation models to capture both local chemical determinants and broader target-context information. Importantly, we show that language-model-derived embeddings provide meaningful higher-order representations of target transcripts, particularly in data-scarce settings. FENNEC achieved robust predictive performance across both gene-level and scaffold-level validation settings, with additional experimental validation on a novel AHSA1-targeting dataset further supporting its generalizability across chemically modified siRNAs. In benchmarking, FENNEC outperformed classical machine-learning and state-of-the-art deep learning models, demonstrating generalization to unseen chemistry. Model interpretation recovered established design principles, including position-specific effects of glycol nucleic acid, 2-fluoro modifications, and phosphorothioate backbones. Furthermore, in silico perturbation analyses suggest that FENNEC can serve not only as a predictive model, but also as an oracle for the design and optimization of chemically modified siRNAs. Together, our work addresses a key gap in the field by enabling chemically aware deep learning for siRNA design, supported by a large and diverse collection of chemically modified siRNA measurements.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.8%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.7%
4
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
6
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
7
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
13
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
16
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
17
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
22
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
NAR Molecular Medicine
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
27
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
28
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%