Back

Single-section spatial hypoxia-cytotoxic associations do not consistently reproduce across breast cancer patients

Dong, B.; Song, Z.; Yin, Y.

2026-07-08 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.06.13.732045 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial transcriptomics can reveal localized tumor-immune relationships, but thousands of spots from one tissue section do not provide thousands of biological replicates. We evaluated the distinction between within-section association and patient-level reproducibility using public breast cancer datasets. In a 10x Genomics Visium discovery section containing 3,798 spots, hypoxia-related transcription was inversely associated with cytotoxic gene activity in neighboring spots (Spearman{rho} = -0.202). High-hypoxia spots also had lower neighborhood cytotoxic scores than low-hypoxia spots (rank-biserial effect = -0.286). We then tested the directional association in an independent HER2-positive cohort comprising 36 sections, 13,619 spots, and eight patients. Only 19 of 36 sections and five of eight patients showed negative associations. The median patient-level correlation was -0.043 and did not differ from zero in a one-sided exact Wilcoxon test (P = 0.473). Sensitivity analyses using alternative cytotoxic and hypoxia signatures, neighborhood sizes, and Kendall correlation did not support a consistent inverse patient-level effect. Thus, a strong single-section association did not consistently reproduce across patients. These results caution against interpreting spot-level spatial associations from one section as patient-level biological effects.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
8
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.1%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.1%
11
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
15
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
26
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
28
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%