Back

Cognitive function depends upon Satb2 gene dosage in cortical projection neurons

Finn, T. S.; Tsyporin, J.; Dai, M.; Wu, S.; Servito, G.; Ma, X.; Zhang, J.; Park, E.; Guo, C.; Shubert, A.; Lizarraga, H.; Stewart, A. A.; Kumar, V.; Marrero, G.; Si, Y.; Katzman, S.; Fillon, A.; Martin, S.; Wu, J.; Zarate, Y.; Chen, F.; Macosko, E.; Chen, L.; Qiu, S.; Fishell, G.; Chen, B.

2026-06-16 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.13.731750 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SATB2-associated syndrome (SAS) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder caused by de novo heterozygous SATB2 mutations, yet how haploinsufficiency disrupts brain development remains poorly understood. While homozygous Satb2 loss causes profound embryonic cell-fate defects, we demonstrate using a heterozygous mouse model that SAS phenotypes emerge primarily during postnatal circuit maturation. Integrating chromatin profiling, transcriptomics, electrophysiology, and behavior, we show that SATB2 acts as a dose-sensitive chromatin regulator that binds conserved enhancer-promoter landscapes to orchestrate networks linked to human intelligence. Although excitatory neuron subtype specification is preserved, Satb2 heterozygotes adopt an intermediate epigenetic state that drives cell-type-specific dysregulation of genes enriched for intellectual disability risk variants. Consequently, mutant neurons exhibit simplified dendritic arborization, reduced intrinsic excitability, and weakened layer 2/3-to-layer 5 intracortical connectivity. These circuit deficits culminate in the disorganization of the somatosensory barrel cortex and severe impairments in whisker-dependent texture discrimination. Finally, by restricting Satb2 heterozygosity to the cortex, we decouple these cortical sensory deficits from subcortical vocalization phenotypes. Together, our work links SATB2 dosage to chromatin architecture and postnatal circuit maturation, revealing a critical, post-mitotic therapeutic window for intervention in SAS.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.