Back

Multi-stage physics-informed neural networks for JAK--STAT5 signaling and ultradian insulin--glucose dynamics: latent-species identifiability and suppression of parameter-induced divergence

Deng, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Yang, X.

2026-06-17 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.06.13.728660 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Coupled diffusion-reaction partial differential equations (PDEs) describe biochemical network dynamics but are difficult to solve for realistic multi-species systems without combining mechanism and data. We present a multi-stage physics-informed neural network (PINN) for multi-species diffusion-reaction PDEs and apply it to two ordinary-differential-equation (ODE) reference systems: the Boehm et al. JAK-STAT5 signaling pathway and the Sturis ultradian insulin-glucose model. For STAT5 we pose a latent-species identifiability test: given sparse observations of eight species, a ten-species model that retains two deliberately withheld but mechanistically standard components--an active receptor-JAK complex and the SOCS negative-feedback inhibitor--recovers the reference trajectory and reduces mean root-mean-square error 3.1-fold relative to an eight-species model that omits them, whereas a PDE-only solution without data anchoring diverges. Because the reference is itself ODE-generated, this demonstrates identifiability against synthetic data, not the discovery of new biology. For the insulin-glucose model the same framework reproduces the [~]120-minute oscillation to 1.0% mean relative error as a benchmark on a stiff, multi-timescale oscillator; its spatial dimension is treated as a numerical construct, not a physical transport setting. A Lyapunov analysis of the STAT5 ODE returns a maximal exponent statistically indistinguishable from zero ({lambda}max {approx} 3.61 x 10-5 min-1, 5/8 trials positive; Lyapunov time [~]1.9 x 104 min, far exceeding the 240-720 min horizon), so the system is effectively non-chaotic and the relevant instability is a bounded, parameter-induced trajectory divergence. Anchoring the solution to baseline data suppresses this divergence, with the reduction growing monotonically with sampling density--from [~]15-19% at eight time points to [~]88-97% at sixty-four, depending on perturbation magnitude. The framework thus offers a data-anchored route to latent-species identifiability and divergence suppression in biochemical ODE/PDE systems, demonstrated here against synthetic reference data. Inside cells, a three-dimensional chemistry of diffusing, reacting molecules drives signaling and rhythm--dynamics that, for realistic networks, strain conventional solvers. Here a multi-stage physics-informed neural network--machine learning constrained by the governing equations--solves stiff, multi-species reaction systems from sparse data. In the JAK-STAT5 signaling pathway, a model that retains two standard but unobserved components (an active receptor complex and a negative-feedback brake) recovers a reference trajectory that a reduced model cannot--a controlled test of whether sparse data can pin down withheld pecies, not a claim of new biology. The same framework reproduces the roughly two-hour insulin-glucose rhythm to within 1% as a benchmark on a stiff oscillator. And anchoring the solution to a few dozen baseline measurements collapses parameter-induced trajectory divergence, turning a parametrically sensitive simulation into a stable one. Where mechanism and data meet, sparse measurements can constrain the structure a model would otherwise leave undetermined.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.0%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.0%
4
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.6%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
8
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.1%
10
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
11
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.3%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.8%
13
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
22
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
23
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
25
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
26
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
27
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Entropy
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Nature Physics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%