Back

Challenges and opportunities of gap score methods for studying psychopathology resilience and vulnerability

Modi, H.; Baranger, D. A.; Balbona, J. V.; Naranjo Rincon, S.; Gorelik, A. J.; Bogdan, R.; Bijsterbosch, J. D.

2026-06-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.13.26355592 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The widespread prevalence of psychopathology, which affects approximately 50% of the global population, often manifests during adolescence. Understanding why some individuals remain resilient while others experience mental health challenges despite similar environmental risks is essential for developing early interventions. However, past efforts have faced challenges with the retrospective definition of resilience. Here, we aim to address these challenges by quantifying resilience to psychopathology at the individual level. Methods: In the Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study(R) (N = 11,868), we utilized gradient-boosted tree regression to predict 2-year follow-up psychopathology from 208 Social Determinants of Health features. We used the "gap score" method--the difference between model-predicted and reported psychopathology--to quantify individual differences in psychopathology resilience and susceptibility, defined as the Resilience-Susceptibility Gap (RS-Gap). We validated the RS-Gap against independent 3-year follow-up clinical and quality-of-life outcomes. Results: Collinearity between gap scores and reported symptoms was high (r=-0.84), requiring further correction. Four bias-correction techniques were implemented and compared. After appropriate bias-correction, greater RS-Gap scores were associated with a higher likelihood of poor academic and social outcomes one year later, suggesting that early adaptation to adversity may carry a latent long-term cost. Conclusions: Dependency between RS-Gap and psychopathology scores is a statistical challenge for gap score resilience methods. Our comparisons demonstrate that correction is mandatory to separate resilience signal from shared variance with psychopathology scores. Findings converged across different bias correction methods, providing a validated framework for using gap scores to identify high-risk developmental trajectories in youth.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
4
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
5
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.0%
9
JCPP Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
European Psychiatry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
16
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
21
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
23
Neurobiology of Stress
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Biological Psychology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%