Back

Virus-human protein-protein interactions predict viral phenotypes

Zhang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Ge, X.; Meng, X.; Peng, Y.

2026-06-13 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.12.732009 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Viral phenotypes such as host and tissue tropism are critical determinants of viral infection and transmission. Inferring viral phenotypes presents unique challenges compared to cellular organisms, as viruses rely entirely on host machinery for replication and survival. Current methods for predicting viral phenotypes mainly rely on viral genomic data, often overlooking host-related information. Here, we evaluated the utility of predicted virus-human protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in inferring diverse viral phenotypes using machine-learning algorithms. For predicting human infectivity, a PPI-based machine learning model outperformed both virus genomic and protein sequence-based models that used large language model embeddings. It also surpassed previous methods that incorporated both viral and host genomic data. The human proteins identified by the model were significantly enriched in functions related to viral infection and immune response. In predicting various phenotypes of human RNA viruses, PPI-based models performed better than virus sequence-based models in forecasting virulence, human transmissibility and transmission routes, while showing comparable performance to genomic sequence-based models in predicting tissue tropism. Finally, we demonstrated that a PPI-based model could distinguish high-risk HPV genotypes from low-risk ones. Proteins associated with high-risk HPV were involved in apoptosis and immune regulation, whereas those linked to low-risk HPV were enriched in telomere maintenance and DNA repair. Collectively, this study is the first to demonstrate the value of predicted virus-human PPIs in inferring viral phenotypes, thereby enhancing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying these phenotypes. It also provides effective tools for risk assessment of emerging viruses, contributing to improved pandemic preparedness.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.9%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.3%
6
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.2%
9
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Journal of Virology
499 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
14
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
16
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.5%
18
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
19
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
21
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
25
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
27
Virology Journal
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
28
NAR Molecular Medicine
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
30
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%