Saturation Genome Editing reveals the functional impact of RAD51D and XRCC2 variants
Casadei, S. S.; Snyder, M. M.; Woo, I. I.; Smith, N. N.; Best, S. S.; Garge, R. R.; Rodriguez-Salas, L. L.; Wenman, C. C.; Seid, O. O.; Hosokai, A. A.; Xu, A. A.; Tejura, M. M.; Gupta, P. P.; Heidl, S. S.; Muffley, L. L.; Ranchalis, J. J.; Stewart, R. R.; Goff, N. N.; Hemker, S. S.; Baierl, J. J.; Dicks, E. E.; Paul, P. P.; Bjornkjaer, L. L.; Roenlund, K. K.; Kitzman, J. J.; Bernstein, K. K.; Stergachis, A. A.; Radivojac, P. P.; Fowler, D. D.; Starita, L. L.
Show abstract
Germline pathogenic variants in RAD51D and XRCC2, which encode RAD51 paralogs that form a heterodimer within the BCDX2 complex, confer increased cancer risk and homologous recombination deficiency. However, most RAD51D and XRCC2 variants in ClinVar are classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), limiting clinical utility. Here, we applied saturation genome editing (SGE) to measure the effects of 5,412 RAD51D and 3,743 XRCC2 variants on cellular fitness and additionally assessed 2,876 and 2,069 variants in these genes for effects on RNA expression. Fitness scores discriminated pathogenic from benign variants with near-perfect accuracy (AUC=0.994 for RAD51D; AUC=1.000 for XRCC2). Integration of RNA expression data revealed RAD51D, but not XRCC2, is exceptionally sensitive to splice-altering variation, with 24% of RAD51D loss-of-function missense variants acting through RNA-mediated mechanisms compared to only 5% in XRCC2. These SGE datasets provide strong, splice-resolved functional evidence to support variant classification across both genes.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Synchronized long-read genome, methylome, epigenome, and transcriptome for resolving a Mendelian condition 98%
- Genome-scale quantification and prediction of pathogenic stop codon readthrough by small molecules 97%
- Orphan CpG islands boost the regulatory activity of poisedenhancers and dictate the responsiveness of their target genes 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.