Back

Comparative genomics reveals potential mechanisms of invasion in Phragmites australis (common reed)

Wimalagunasekara, S.; Garcia, R. S.; Nguyen, T. T.; Pantha, P.; Wang, G.; Oh, D.-H.; Bickford, W. A.; Kowalski, K. P.; Clay, K.; Dassanayake, M.

2026-07-08 plant biology
10.64898/2026.06.12.731924 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biological invasions are transforming ecosystems worldwide, yet the genomic bases enabling certain species to dominate new environments remain poorly understood. Phragmites australis, a widespread wetland grass with invasive and native subspecies co-occurring in North America, provides a powerful system to investigate genomic mechanisms of invasiveness. We generated independent chromosome-scale genome assemblies for invasive P. australis ssp. australis and co-occurring native ssp. americanus and used comparative genomic and transcriptomic analyses to identify lineage-specific innovations associated with invasive success. The invasive subspecies exhibits genomic novelties through functionally-biased single-copy orthologs, intronless genes, and subgenome expression asymmetry, along with a stress-ready basal transcriptome relative to the native subspecies. Following the removal of aboveground shoots ("cutback"), which measures the ability to recover from damage, the invasive subspecies undergoes stronger transcriptional reprogramming, increased shoot production, and higher biomass accumulation compared to the native. It also displays expansion of gene families and coordinately expressed gene modules that support resource mobilization, growth responses to light, and stress tolerance. Beyond Phragmites, comparative analyses across multiple grass genomes, including eight invasive species with related non-invasive species, revealed repeated expansion of gene families associated with abiotic stress tolerance and developmental regulation, suggesting convergent adaptive strategies in the grass family for invasive success. Together, these results demonstrate genomic architecture linked to invasion success and highlight potential targets for managing invasive grasses.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.5%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.9%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
5.9%
4
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
5
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.6%
7
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
8
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
11
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
13
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
14
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
19
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%
22
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.8%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.8%
25
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
26
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%