Back

The efficiency of different transmission routes of Xanthomonas citri pv. fuscans and other seed-borne bacteria to bean seeds.

Chadelaud, T.; Brault, A.; Briand, M.; Barret, M.; Darrasse, A.

2026-06-12 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.12.731840 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Seed transmission is a critical pathway for the dispersal of phytopathogenic bacteria. This transmission can occur through three main routes: floral, internal, and external. Yet the relative contribution of individual transmission routes remains poorly characterized. Using a pathosystem based on Xanthomonas citri pv. fuscans (Xcf) and common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Flavert), we quantified the efficiency of each route. Under our experimental conditions, the vascular route was the most efficient with 25% of contaminated seeds and population sizes averaging 107 CFU per contaminated seed. Deploying this experimental framework to ten seed-borne bacterial strains isolated from bean revealed that almost none transmitted to seeds through any route, or at best at low efficiency. However, most of the strains were capable of surviving and disseminating within the vascular system. A major bottleneck for seed transmission was identified for pod vascular organs colonization and the similar behavior of an Xcf mutant, deficient in the T3SS, suggested that plant immunity could be involved at this step. Co-inoculation of a consortium composed of the seed-borne strains with Xcf reduced the number of seeds contaminated by Xcf at the highest inoculum concentration, although other consortia members were never recovered from seeds. This suggests that the strains are recognized by the plant and trigger defense responses. These findings also raise questions about the mechanisms used by seed-associated bacteria to colonize seeds in situ.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.3%
2
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.8%
4
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
7
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
9
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
10
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.7%
11
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Plant Pathology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Phytobiomes Journal
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Microbiological Research
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Molecular Plant Pathology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
22
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
24
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
27
Microbial Biotechnology
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%