Back

Microbial inoculation accelerates post-fire soil recovery in a mixed conifer forest

Weiss, E. L.; Banfield, J. F.

2026-06-13 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.12.731757 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-severity wildfires of increasing size and frequency result in release of carbon dioxide and loss of timber resources, reduction in biodiversity, loss of soil, diminished water quality, and reduced recreational opportunities. Forest recovery strongly depends on the reestablishment of soil microbial communities, motivating research on how restoration of soil microbiomes in burned forests can be accelerated. Here, we used a high intensity burn pile experiment to test the effectiveness of post-fire native soil amendment. This design enabled us to sequentially and simultaneously sample unburned, burned, and inoculated burned soils while holding post-fire abiotic factors constant. All conditions were sampled at six time points across an annual hydrological cycle and analyzed using 16S and ITS rRNA amplicon sequencing, genome resolved metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and soil chemistry. Fire sharply reduced bacterial and fungal diversity and eliminated ectomycorrhizal and ericoid symbiotic fungi. Inoculating the burned soil with native microbes accelerated recovery of microbial diversity and of functions associated with nutrient cycling, especially nitrogen transformations. Despite introducing the full diversity of soil microbes from adjacent unburned forest, only a small subset of adapted organisms were engrafted. Native soil inoculation stimulated reestablishment of mycorrhizal fungi, including genera that form essential symbioses with conifers, although this response was not persistent over the full year. Nonetheless, reestablishment of mycorrhizal fungi for even a window of time may facilitate early forest regrowth. We conclude that, by microbial inoculation, recovery that would otherwise rely on dispersal from distant sites is accelerated, potentially enhancing reforestation efforts.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
2
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.6%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.4%
5
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
6
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
10
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
13
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
14
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
Fungal Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
17
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
18
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
21
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
22
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
23
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
24
FEMS Microbes
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
25
Applied Soil Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
26
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
28
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
29
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
30
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%