Back

Global threat abatement potential for terrestrial vertebrates

Ridley, F. A.; Bennun, L.; Brooks, T. M.; Butchart, S. H. M.; Dales, M. W.; Hawkins, F.; Jimenez, R. R.; Macfarlane, N. B. W.; Mcgowan, P. J.; Starnes, T.; Tarr, S.; Turner, J. A.; Baisero, D.; Chanson, J.; Cox, N.; Menon, V.; Neam, K.; Pacifici, M.; Rodriguez, A.; Rodriguez, J. P.; Rondinini, C.; Mair, L.

2026-06-16 zoology
10.64898/2026.06.12.731583 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1.AimThe Species Threat Abatement and Restoration (STAR) metric was developed to support setting and measuring progress towards science-based targets for species conservation, in alignment with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. The STAR metric quantifies the potential reduction in species global extinction risk achievable through actions to abate threats (START) and restore habitat (STARR). The STAR metric is used across multiple sectors to assess contributions to nature-positive species outcomes and implement action for biodiversity. Here we present a substantially enhanced global estimate of START for terrestrial vertebrates. Developed in response to user demand, this work integrates advancements in methodology and data quality, increased spatial resolution, and addition of reptile species. LocationGlobal Time PeriodCurrent Major taxa studiedTerrestrial vertebrates MethodsSTART was estimated at 1km2 resolution for 9,100 species of threatened and Near Threatened birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles, using IUCN Red List assessments (version 2025-1) and area of habitat (AOH) maps generated using an advanced data-driven methodology and satellite-derived land-cover data. AOH maps were validated using a two-stage protocol using species observation data. ResultsThe six countries with the highest estimated START scores, and therefore the largest individual potential to reduce global extinction risk via tackling threats nationally were Brazil, Madagascar, Indonesia, Mexico, Ecuador and Colombia (each contributing over 5% of global estimated START). The threat with the greatest individual potential to reduce extinction risk was annual and perennial non-timber crops (21.2% of global START). Main conclusionsTargeted actions to tackle a few high-impact threats in a few discrete locations, and cumulative effort across multiple areas with lower individual potential, are both required to meaningfully reduce species extinction risk through threat abatement. This global scale estimation of START enables consistent scoping of conservation opportunity over large areas and provides the critical initial data to support planning and action.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.3%
2
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.4%
4
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
8
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
9
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
14
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
18
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
22
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
25
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
29
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
30
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%