Back

Home-based binocular serious games in virtual reality to treat visual acuity and stereovision in residual amblyopia: AMBER study

Aurilia, A.; Martin, N.-L.; Simon-Martinez, C.; Antoniou, M.-P.; Bouthour, W.; Bavelier, D.; Backus, B. T.; Dornbos, B.; Blaha, J. J.; Kropp, M.; Muller, H.; Murray, M. M.; Thumann, G.; Steffen, H.; Matusz, P. J.

2026-06-12 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.06.12.26355255 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Amblyopia is a pediatric visual disorder traditionally treated by patching the fellow eye, though many patients retain residual amblyopia post-treatment. Increasing evidence suggests that visual plasticity allows treat-ment beyond the classical therapeutic window. AMBER evaluated the efficacy of binocular serious games in virtual reality (VR) in residual amblyopia. Methods and Analysis: The monocentric, prospective, randomized, crossover trial (reported as case series) includ-ed 14 anisometropic, strabismic, or mixed residual amblyopia patients (6-35 years; 5 children, 9 adults). Participants underwent two 2-month intervention phases: optical correction (standard care) and standard care plus VR games (2.5 h/week), each with a 2-month follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), stereoacuity, and reading speed were assessed (5 timepoints) using the Sloan and Landolt charts, the Titmus, TNO, Lang II, Asteroid, and Mnread tests. Compliance and adverse events (AE) were recorded. Results: VR training improved BCVA in 10 amblyopic eyes (Landolt and Sloan), with more pronounced effects in anisometropic patients. Six patients showed improved stereoacuity (Titmus; 4x mixed, 1x anisometropic, 1x stra-bismic amblyopia), persistent only in children (1x strabismic, 1x mixed amblyopia). Four improvements were ob-served with TNO (1x), Lang II (1x), Asteroid (0x), and MNread (1x). Despite positive trends, when comparing re-sults of individual patients, between both eyes, and with standard treatment, consistency of improvements cannot be conclusively demonstrated. One non-severe AE (dizziness) was reported. Conclusions: Following individual cases, VR training improved BCVA and stereoacuity, particularly in children and patients with high compliance. However, considering the cohort as a whole, consistency of effects has to be confirmed in larger groups. Thus, the methodologically sophisticated AMBER study revealed differences in VR treatment efficacy between amblyopia types, children/adults, endpoints and tests, offering precious data for the design of meaningful future studies. It shows that neurovisual plasticity gauged by VR-games offers safe, engaging treatment options for residual amblyopia.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.3%
2
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
5
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
8
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
9
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
12
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
14
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
17
Experimental Eye Research
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%