Back

Nocturnal Respiratory Rate and Variability Predict Long-term Mortality in Stable Outpatients with Cardiovascular Disease

Pedros-Valls, R.; Gupta, K. S.; Harrington, N.; Yu, J. D.; Orr, J.; Owens, R. L.; Torres Barba, D.; King, K. R.

2026-06-15 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.12.26355214 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Respiratory rate (RR) predicts short-term mortality in acute care settings, yet its prognostic significance in clinically stable outpatients remains poorly defined. Objectives: To determine whether the median and variability of nocturnal respiratory rate (NRR) are independently associated with long-term cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in outpatients with cardiovascular disease. Methods: We analyzed overnight chest belt waveforms from elective polysomnography in 5,679 older adults with cardiovascular disease enrolled in the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS). NRR was quantified at 30-second resolution, and per-subject median NRR and within-night variability (standard deviation) were derived. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate associations with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality over 3-year and 15-year follow-up periods, adjusting for demographic characteristics, cardiopulmonary comorbidities, and sleep apnea severity. Results: Higher median NRR and greater NRR variability were each associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Combining these metrics identified a high-risk group characterized by elevated median and high variability of NRR, with approximately five-fold higher 3-year all-cause mortality compared with a low-risk group; this association remained significant in Cox models (unadjusted HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 1.65, 4.14; p<0.001; adjusted HR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.30, 3.55; p=0.003). Conclusions: Both the baseline level and variability of NRR independently predict mortality in clinically stable outpatients with cardiovascular disease. Densely profiled NRR represents a promising, underutilized biomarker for long-term risk stratification.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
4
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
5
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
Journal of Sleep Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
8
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Sleep
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
14
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
18
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
20
Sleep Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
22
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
25
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
27
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
28
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
29
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
30
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%