Back

Latent tuberculosis infection workflows in four primary healthcare systems in the United States

Espey, J.; Venci, J.; Wada, P. Y.; Sorri, Y.; Tang, A.; Francis, B.; Skarbinski, J.; Narita, M.; Shete, P. B.; Kathryn, W.

2026-06-15 primary care research
10.64898/2026.06.12.26355200 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Latent tuberculosis - infection (LTBI) reactivation accounts for most tuberculosis (TB) cases in the United States (U.S.). Expanding primary care LTBI services can improve detection and treatment, but real-world implementation is not well described. Objective: Describe how LTBI screening and treatment workflows are operationalized into practice in diverse U.S. primary care health systems. Design: Descriptive, multi-site study. Setting: Four U.S. primary care health systems participating in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Tuberculosis Epidemiologic Studies Consortium III (TBESC-III, 2020-2022). Patients: Patients visiting any study site (N = 3,522,077). Measurements: Electronic medical record (EMR) data on patient demographics, TB test type, and results. Using narrative reporting and study documentation, LTBI care workflows were summarized by site into six domains: patient registration, TB testing evaluation, TB testing, TB disease assessment, LTBI diagnosis, and LTBI treatment. Results: Sites implemented recommended practices for testing and treatment: interferon-gamma release assays were the predominant test, and short-course rifamycin-based regimens were the primary treatment. Follow-up care practices and documentation of treatment outcomes varied. Country of birth was not consistently recorded at all sites, limiting TB screening capability based on nativity. Physician training, EMR decision-support tools, and patient education resources differed in scope and availability. Limitations: Descriptive design using self-reported workflows; may not generalize to all primary care settings or reflect physician-level variations. Conclusion: We provide a descriptive snapshot showing how LTBI care workflows varied in approach and consistency at four primary care systems with integrated LTBI services. These real-world examples may serve as templates for U.S. primary care systems seeking to expand TB testing and treatment. Primary Funding Source: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (TBESC-III).

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.