Back

Efficient Transmission in the Blowfly Early Visual Synapses Through the Regularization of Vesicle Release

Kashef, G. M.; de Ruyter van Steveninck, R.

2026-06-15 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.11.731739 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Early studies of synaptic transmission by Bernard Katz and colleagues suggested that neurotransmitter release at graded-potential synapses occurs through statistically independent (i.e. Poissonian) quanta [1, 2]. Subsequent experimental work supported this framework [3]. However, these measurements were performed in vitro on relatively simple synapses and under non-physiological conditions, often converting spiking neurons into graded-potential neurons through the use of channel blockers. Relying on the conventional assumption that vesicle exocytosis follows a Poisson process, measurements of the contrast power transfer spectrum and noise power spectral density of large monopolar cells (LMCs) in the blowfly C. vicina imply a sustained vesicle release rate exceeding 105 vesicles per second per LMC. Given the physical dimensions of photoreceptors and synaptic vesicles, such a release rate appears physiologically implausible. If vesicle release is more temporally structured, low-frequency noise could be suppressed, substantially reducing the vesicle release rate required to account for experimental observations. The reduction of noise at low frequencies is especially advantageous given inputs such as photoreceptor signals which are already low-pass filtered. Visual activity generates substantial extracellular potentials within the lamina cartridge [4]. We propose that these extracellular potentials regulate vesicle release by modulating the voltage sensors that trigger exocytosis. We provide experimental evidence for the connection between currents driving the LMC and the extracellular potentials during visual activity, and demonstrate, using simple models, how effective "Poisson" rates are maximized due to vesicle regularization.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.6%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
3
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.6%
4
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.6%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
12
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
15
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
17
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
20
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
24
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
27
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%