Back

Climbing-fiber-like online readout adaptation in frozen continuous-time networks reproduces force-field adaptation and after-effects

Kobayashi, J.

2026-06-15 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.11.731593 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Robotic motor control built on liquid neural networks and related continuous-time models, such as LTC and CfC, is typically trained offline via backpropagation through time and lacks an explicit mechanism for recalibrating online as plant dynamics change. We ask whether a frozen CfC core, whose liquid state spans a fixed continuous-time basis, can support cerebellar-style online adaptation by adapting only its linear readout with a climbing-fiber-like error signal. In a planar two-link reaching simulation with a velocity-dependent curl force field, we adapt the readout online with a feedback-error-learning (FEL) signal under a least-mean-squares (LMS) rule, leaving the core untouched. The frozen-core readout-only controller re-straightens curl-perturbed reaches and, upon field removal, produces a mirror-image after-effect, a behavioral signature consistent with internal-model learning, which a feedback-only controller does not produce. The result generalizes from a dense CfC to a sparse Neural-Circuit-Policy (NCP) wiring when the recurrent state, rather than the projected motor output, is used as the readout basis; it is robust to force-field strength and direction; and a recursive-least-squares variant adapts faster but de-adapts slowly because its covariance collapses, a rigidity that a covariance-reset safe-forgetting rule removes. Within the explored two-link planar simulation range, we did not find a readout-only failure case that required adapting the frozen core in the tested conditions. In this simulation study, adapting only the readout therefore provides a biologically inspired, low-cost online error-adaptation layer for offline-trained continuous-time controllers.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
2
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.7%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
6
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
8
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
10
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.7%
16
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
18
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
19
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
26
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.8%