Back

Evolutionary biomechanics of maximum running speed in spiders (Araneae)

Kuchibhotla, S.; Kelly, M.; Jackel, V.; Bane, E.; Beck, H. K.; Wolff, J. O.; Labonte, D.

2026-06-15 zoology
10.64898/2026.06.11.731532 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMaximum running speed is a central performance trait, linking morphology, physiology and behaviour to fitness. It is shaped by physical capacity and ecological selection but may also be constrained by ancestry. To examine how these forces interact across macroevolutionary timescales, we conducted an allometric study in a hyper-diverse arthropod taxon--spiders (Araneae). ResultsDrawing on running performance data for 258 species from 64 of the 139 extant spider families, we integrated phylogenetic comparative methods and biomechanical modelling to disentangle the effects of body size, ancestry, leg morphology, ecological guild and preferred locomotor orientation. Maximum running speed varied substantially, both across body mass and among species of similar body mass. By accounting for body mass with a recent biomechanical model, we show that size-specific performance carries a strong phylogenetic signal, and that high-performing runners first evolved within the derived infraorder Araneomorphae.Strong running performance, after accounting for both body size and shared ancestry, was associated with relatively longer legs and, to a lesser extent, ecological guild, but not with leg slenderness or a preference for inverted versus upright locomotion. ConclusionsMacroevolutionary patterns of running performance thus reflect not only variation in body size, but also size-specific leg morphology, ecological differentiation and phylogenetic history. We hope this study contributes to the development of formal evolutionary biomechanics--one that seeks to explain patterns of diversity through the explicit integration of large-scale comparative data, natural history and quantitative models derived from first principles.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.5%
2
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.6%
3
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
4
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
5
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
6
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.2%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.1%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Integrative Organismal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
19
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
20
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.4%
22
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
23
Journal of Avian Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
25
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
27
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
28
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
29
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
30
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%