Back

Circular RNA vaccine performance is determined by RNA quality and epitranscriptomic tuning rather than innate activation

Martin, A. L.; Cotterell, J. F.; Buick, K. H.; Bird, T. W.; Kuang, J.; Palmer, O. R.; Mason, N. C.; White, L.; Draper, S. L.; Foster, A. J.; Painter, G. F.; Montgomerie, I.; Oulavallickal, T.; Patrick, W. M.; Connor, L. M.

2026-06-15 immunology
10.64898/2026.06.11.731499 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Circular RNA (circRNA) is an emerging vaccine modality that is proposed to improve stability, reduce reactogenicity and extend antigen expression compared with linear mRNA. However, the relative contributions to vaccine performance of its covalently closed structure, its purity, and of nucleotide modifications remain poorly described. Here, we systematically dissected these parameters in vivo across two antigen systems. We identified RNA quality as a major determinant of circRNA reactogenicity, with differences in innate immune activation tracking with the presence of residual RNA species in less refined preparations. In contrast, highly purified circRNA exhibited markedly reduced reactogenicity compared with linear mRNA, independent of nucleotide modification. Despite these differences, circRNA and mRNA vaccines elicited comparable antibody titres and T cell responses, indicating that reduced innate activation does not enhance adaptive immune magnitude. Notably, incorporating N6-methyladenosine (m6A) did not affect reactogenicity or antigen expression but selectively enhanced antibody quality, increasing binding affinity and neutralisation capacity. CircRNA vaccination also altered the anatomical distribution of germinal centre responses, reducing splenic antigen-specific germinal centre B cells while preserving lymph node responses. Together, these findings show that circRNA vaccine performance is governed by RNA preparation quality and epitranscriptomic tuning rather than innate activation alone.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.