Back

Co-designed Sleep Health Program Improves Sleep Health of Australian First Nations Adolescents: Findings from a Pilot Study

Fatima, Y.; Senden, R. V.; Huda, M. M.; Marshall, A. J.; Sullivan, D. P.; Bucks, R.; Potia, A. H.; Smith, S. S.; Blunden, S.; McDaid, L.; Fanti, M.; Eastwood, P. R.; Yiallourou, S.; Walsh, J.; Mamun, A.; King, S.; Varela, S.; Solomon, S.; Skinner, T. C.

2026-06-22 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.11.26355484 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Adolescent sleep health is a growing public health concern, yet no culturally responsive sleep health program has been developed for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (First Nations) young people. This study reports the outcomes and acceptability of Australia's first co-designed sleep health program for First Nations adolescents. Methods: The Let's Yarn About Sleep adolescent program was co-designed with First Nations community members from 23 Traditional groups, involving 174 Elders, adolescents, parents, carers, and service providers. The program drew on an Aboriginal pedagogical framework and the COM-B behaviour change model, integrating Western and First Nations sleep science, and was delivered by Aboriginal Youth Workers trained as Sleep Coaches. Outcomes included self-reported improvements in sleep knowledge, sleep timing and continuity, sleep quality, overall sleep health, and psychological distress. Post-program changes in outcomes were assessed using linear mixed-effects regression analyses. Program ratings and yarning-based feedback assessed acceptability. Findings: 70 First Nations young people participated in the program (median age 13.0 years, range 12 - 8; 67.1% female). Sleep knowledge improved substantially, with the mean composite score increasing from -0.65 (SD 1.23) at baseline to 0.82 (SD 1.27) at follow-up, a large effect (Cohen's d = 1.18; p < 0.001). A significant improvement was observed in the overall sleep health score, representing a medium effect (Cohen's d = 0.63; {beta} = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.31 - 1.04; p < 0.001). Psychological distress showed a directional reduction that did not reach statistical significance (Cohen's d = 0.32; {beta} =0.49, 95% CI:-1.08 - 0.09; p = 0.097), though a modest beneficial effect cannot be excluded. High acceptability was reflected in program ratings and qualitative feedback, with participants reporting greater sleep awareness, improved sleep behaviours, and strong community engagement with the program. Interpretation: A culturally grounded, co-designed sleep health program can improve sleep knowledge and overall sleep health and achieve high acceptability among First Nations adolescents. Community leadership, local delivery, and the embedding of First Nations worldviews are likely central to achieving impact, highlighting a promising pathway to address sleep health inequities Funding: Medical Research Future Fund (APP1201569). No competing interests

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.8%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.4%
3
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.4%
4
Sleep Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
5
Sleep
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
7
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Sleep Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
Sleep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.8%
16
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
17
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%