Back

Paired plasma and EV-enriched plasma proteomics reveal nonredundant sepsis-associated host-response signatures in critical illness

Rice, S. J.; Khaleghi Ardabili, A.; Ruiz-Velasco, V.; Bonavia, A. S.

2026-06-22 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.06.11.26355454 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Plasma proteomics may identify host-response signatures in sepsis, but it is unclear whether extracellular vesicle (EV)-enriched plasma provides distinct or redundant information compared with plasma. We compared paired plasma and EV-enriched plasma proteomes in critically ill patients with sepsis and critically ill non-sepsis controls (CINS). Methods: In this prospective observational study, paired plasma and EV-enriched plasma samples were analyzed from 56 critically ill adults, including 40 patients with sepsis and 16 CINS patients. Protein abundance was quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analyses compared proteomic depth, protein overlap, global concordance between compartments, and differential protein abundance between CINS and sepsis. Exploratory Gene Ontology enrichment was performed as a supplementary analysis. Results: EV-enriched plasma expanded proteomic detection, identifying 2,476 filtered proteins compared with 506 in plasma. Only 386 proteins were detected in both compartments, while 2,090 were unique to EV-enriched plasma and 120 were unique to plasma. Among shared proteins, plasma and EV-enriched plasma showed modest global concordance across critically ill patients (Spearman coeff = 0.322, p = 9.19 x 10^-11), with similar findings in sepsis alone. Differential abundance analysis identified 11 sepsis-associated proteins in plasma and 22 in EV-enriched plasma. Only SAA1, SAA2, and IGFBP6 were significant in both compartments. Exploratory pathway analysis supported acute-phase and inflammatory enrichment in plasma sepsis-associated proteins, while EV-enriched signals were directionally plausible but did not meet prespecified FDR thresholds. Conclusion: Plasma and EV-enriched plasma proteomics capture related but nonredundant sepsis-associated host-response information in critically ill patients.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.2%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
4
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.6%
6
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
7
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
8
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
12
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Physiological Genomics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
27
Molecular Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
28
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
30
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%