Back

Genome-wide association and multi-omics functional screens reveal the genetic architecture of foveal development

Hunt, C.; Patil, M.; Syed, H.; Yoon, H.-J.; Yang, T.; Rodwell, V.; Tu, Z.; Maconachie, G. D.; Coley, K.; Lirio, A.; Shrine, N.; Packer, R.; Fassad, M.; SHENOY, R.; Allcock, N.; Lim, B.; Kuht, H. J.; Varma, G.; Karaer, I.; Injety, R.; Jakins, W.; Savant, R.; Sekhri, R.; Hisaund, M.; Han, J.; Teli, S.; Wang, J.; Zuo, Z.; Whittingham, J.; Douglas, G.; Sylvius, N.; Vasudevan, P. C.; Moshiri, A.; Zippin, J.; Brooks, B. P.; Montoliu, L.; Gottlob, I.; Chen, K.-F.; Yoshimatsu, T.; Tobin, M. D.; Norton, W. H.; Chen, R.; Batini, C.; Thomas, M. G.

2026-06-12 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.06.11.26355452 medRxiv
Show abstract

Foveal hypoplasia causes visual impairment across congenital eye disorders, yet the genetic programmes governing foveal development remain poorly characterised and no tractable model exists for foveal disease. In the first genome-wide association study of foveal hypoplasia, we identified 42 sentinel variants mapping to 54 effector genes supported by >= 2 criteria from a variant-to-gene framework incorporating developmental multi-omics. Disruption of six effector genes using mutant lines and CRISPR knockouts in the zebrafish high acuity zone recapitulates structural, functional, and ultrastructural hallmarks of foveal hypoplasia, establishing the first vertebrate disease model. Integration with human foetal single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveals two temporal waves of effector gene expression and identifies Muller glia as critical mediators of foveal patterning. Phenome-wide analyses reveal foveal variants are pleiotropic with refractive, lenticular, and metabolic traits, connecting foveal development to anterior segment and systemic disease biology. These findings should inform mechanistic studies of macular disease.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.