Back

Species responses to nutrient loading promote resistance but not temporal stability in floating macrophyte communities

Ross, S. R. P.-J.; Mihai, A.; Kojima, C.; Armitage, D. W.

2026-06-14 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.10.731482 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Determining the drivers of ecological stability amid accelerating global environmental change is a critical goal of contemporary ecology. Various candidate drivers have been suggested, with recent attention turning to response diversity--the variation among organism-environment responses. However, despite conceptual interest in response diversity as a driver of stability, there remain few field tests of this relationship. Using multi-species competitive communities of floating aquatic macrophytes as an experimental model for measuring temporal stability and response diversity to nutrient loading, we show that response diversity does not promote temporal stability of total macrophyte cover, but that communities with an uneven distribution of species responses were more resistant to an exogenous shock. To quantify macrophyte composition and growth dynamics from photographic time series of our experimental communities, we developed an open-source, scalable, machine learning workflow (LeafMosaic) capable of classifying four species from noisy field data including variable lighting, resolution, and plant morphology. We measured response diversity as the balance of positive and negative biomass growth responses to dissolved nitrate concentration, weighted by species relative contributions to biomass, and tested its effect on temporal stability and resistance to an unexpected pulse disturbance (a large typhoon that disrupted our outdoor mesocosms). Response imbalance predicted typhoon resistance, but species asynchrony and mean population stability best predicted community stability, with no direct or indirect effect of species responses. Overall, our results provide new experimental evidence for how the structure of species responses promotes stability, and we aim our LeafMosaic workflow to empower future field experiments using floating macrophytes to study response diversity and ecological stability.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
4
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
6
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
9
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
10
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.5%
16
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.1%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
21
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
28
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%