Back

LizardMorph: A generalizable machine learning framework for automated anatomical landmark detection in digital images

Quintana, M.; Loh, L. Y.; Parikh, A.; Suh, J. J.; Chavez, V.; Porto, A.; Shi, B.; Stroud, J. T.

2026-06-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.10.731351 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Morphological measurements underpin a wide range of ecological and evolutionary research, yet the manual landmarking workflows on which most morphometric studies depend remain a persistent bottleneck that limits both the pace and scale of biological research. Machine learning offers compelling solutions, but most automated landmarking tools require substantial computational expertise, creating a gap between technical capability and practical adoption by biologists. Here, we present LizardMorph, an integrated machine learning pipeline and web-based interface for semi-automated anatomical landmark detection on biological images. LizardMorph couples a fine-tuned ML-Morph shape predictor with an accessible, browser-based interface that enables researchers to upload images, review automated landmark predictions, interactively correct outliers through point-and-click editing, and export results in standard morphometric formats--all without programming expertise or local software installation. Using dorsal X-ray radiographs of Anolis lizards with 34 anatomical landmarks as a proof-of-concept, we show that the ML-Morph model achieves high predictive accuracy, with landmarks on well-defined skeletal structures predicted with 100% accuracy within a 1 mm tolerance threshold. A controlled user study comparing LizardMorph against traditional manual landmarking (TpsDig2) demonstrated significant efficiency gains: experienced annotators completed LizardMorph landmark verification 37.5% faster than manual annotation. Extrapolated to batch processing 1,000 lizards, LizardMorph saves experienced researchers approximately 6.5 hours of manual processing time. Critically, LizardMorph implements a human-in-the-loop design in which automated predictions serve as editable starting points, preserving researcher oversight and enabling correction of the occasional large-error outliers that would be unacceptable in fully automated workflows. LizardMorph is freely available as an open-source tool and provides a replicable framework for developing ML-assisted annotation tools that can democratize access to high-quality morphometric analysis across diverse biological research communities.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.7%
3
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
5
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
6
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
7
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.4%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
12
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
16
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
21
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
25
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
26
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
27
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
28
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.0%
30
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%