Back

How to Catch a Blank Mind? Brain Similarities and Differences between Self- and Probe-Caught Mind Blanking

Aragon-Daud, A.; Boulakis, P. A.; Mortaheb, S.; Vandewalle, G.; Collette, F.; Patil, K. R.; Demertzi, A.; Raimondo, F.

2026-06-15 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.10.731344 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mind Blanking (MB) is a mental state characterized by the experience of a seemingly empty mind. This apparent emptiness challenges the theoretical view of a continuous and content-full stream of thought, leading to the question of how it is possible to capture MB events in the first place. MB research has relied largely on probe-caught experience-sampling, during which participants are interrupted at random times to report their mental state. This approach risks missing some MB events as they may occur between probes. Self-caught paradigms, on the other hand, allow participants to report MB upon spontaneously realizing it, relying on meta-awareness. To date, it is not clear whether these two methods capture the same phenomenon neuronally. Here, we investigated whether probe-caught MB (pMB) and self-caught MB (sMB) converge on their behavioral properties and brain correlates. Twenty-two participants underwent 3T fMRI scanning while performing both a pMB and a sMB experience-sampling task. We compared the behavioral properties, BOLD activations and time-varying functional connectivity (FC) across the two approaches. We found that reporting frequencies of pMB and sMB were significantly correlated across individuals, and both MB reports were uniformly distributed over time, pointing towards a behavioral convergence across approaches. However, we observed a divergence in BOLD activations, as sMB recruited significantly greater activation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) compared to pMB, likely reflecting the meta-awareness and metacognitive monitoring required for self-detecting a MB. Lastly, time-varying FC analysis revealed a convergence, with both pMB and sMB FC resembling a hyperconnectivity pattern compared to other content-full mental states, pointing towards low arousal FC. Together, our results show that sMB and pMB converge on overlapping neurobehavioral correlates. This positions the self-caught method as a complementary tool for studying MB without external interruption, while highlighting the role of meta-awareness in self-report detection.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.3%
3
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.5%
4
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.1%
6
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
10
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
12
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
13
Biological Psychology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.3%
15
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
17
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
18
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.5%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
23
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
26
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.6%