Back

Mapping distribution of invasive plant species and uncertainty using citizen science, remote sensing, and deep learning

Qiang, X.; Gillespie, L. E.; Xi, J.; Gounaridis, D.; Zhu, K.

2026-06-12 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.10.731341 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Invasive plants pose a major environmental problem, threatening biodiversity, altering ecosystem functions, and causing economic loss. Climate change is altering environmental conditions, potentially facilitating the spread of invasive plant species, posing challenges for ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation. Accurate predictions of invasive species distributions are therefore essential for effective monitoring and early intervention. Species distribution models (SDMs) have become an important tool for predicting species habitats, but many studies rely on traditional machine learning approaches, focus on single-species predictions and overlook uncertainty associated with future climate scenarios. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a deep learning-based SDM framework, Deepbiosphere, for predicting both native and invasive plant species distributions on a regional scale, the US state of Michigan, and to assess how climate scenario uncertainty influences spatial predictions of invasive species risk particularly on two focal invasive species. Results show that Deepbiosphere outcompeted other baseline models by on average of 10.98% with a mean AUC-ROC of 0.79 across 1553 vascular plant species. For two invasive species Rhamnus cathartica and Ailanthus altissima, Deepbiosphere respectively improved modeling accuracy by an average of 56.41% and 74.99%, suggesting its enhanced predictive capability for invasive species. Current predictions indicated that R. cathartica is already broadly suitable across much of Michigan, whereas A. altissima is currently more restricted to southern regions. Under future climate scenarios, both species were projected to expand northward, with a particularly strong expansion signal for A. altissima. Prediction uncertainty was spatially heterogeneous, where general circulation models (GCMs) were the dominant source of uncertainty across most of the state. By integrating citizen science, remote sensing, and deep learning, we produced high-resolution risk-uncertainty maps for key invasive species and highlighted the importance of explicitly mapping uncertainty to support more informed invasive species management under climate change.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.1%
2
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
3
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.4%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.3%
6
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.2%
8
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
9
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
12
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
13
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
15
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
16
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
GeoHealth
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
20
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.6%
22
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
23
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
24
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
25
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
26
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
28
Remote Sensing
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
29
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
30
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%