Back

Water oxidation-driven histidine dioxidation enables probe-free proximity labeling

Lee, C.; Lee, J. K.; Yoo, C.-M.; Kim, B. G.; Yoon, G.; Kang, J.; Na, S.; Rhee, H.-W.; Kwon, T.-H.

2026-06-12 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.06.10.731337 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Photocatalytic proximity labeling (photo-PL) has emerged as a powerful tool for spatial proteomics in subcellular compartments. However, many photo-PL toolboxes rely on singlet oxygen (1O2) to generate highly unstable endoperoxide intermediates that must be trapped immediately by high concentrations of exogenous probes. This constraint can bias spatial proteome coverage, particularly in dynamic and heterogeneous compartments such as endosomes and exosomes, where probe accessibility is intrinsically nonuniform. Here, we develop IDM, an organic photocatalyst that generates hydroxyl (*OH) and superoxide (O *-) radicals via water oxidation instead of 1O , enabling a synergistic dual-radical mechanism for probe-free proximal protein mapping in live cells (PF-Map). The resulting radicals dioxidize proximal histidine residues into a persistent dioxidized state (His-2O) that is thermodynamically stabilized as lactam tautomers, which remain electrophilic and chemically addressable after cell lysis. By decoupling histidine oxidation from live{square}cell probe capture, PF{square}Map can minimize spatial bias arising from heterogeneous probe distribution. Applying PF{square}Map to intracellular vesicle trafficking, we find that both PF{square}Map and a probe{square}dependent workflow (PD{square}Map) robustly identify exosome markers, whereas PF{square}Map additionally reveals a hidden vesicle trafficking-related subproteome that PD-Map underestimated. Together, we establish a minimally biased photocatalytic strategy for spatial protein mapping in complex biological systems. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/731337v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13da43dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e9cb7corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2e7557org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19e16c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.6%
3
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
6
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
7
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
8
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
9
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.1%
11
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Angewandte Chemie
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
19
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
20
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
22
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
24
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Nature Nanotechnology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%