Back

The Geometry of Allostery: A Laplacian Minor Hierarchy for Many-Body Protein Communication

Senguler Ciftci, F.; Erman, B.

2026-06-12 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.10.731266 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantifying how cooperative, many-body relationships drive allostery in protein networks remains a major challenge. To address this, we develop the Laplacian minor hierarchy, a mathematical framework that characterizes the geometric invariants of a protein network. Lower-order minors yield standard metrics including the partition function and effective distances, whereas higher-order minors define novel topological measures: cooperation indices, each bounded between zero and one, that characterize pathway correlations at increasing levels of complexity, the third-order minor determines whether allosteric pathways are correlated or uncorrelated, and the fourth-order minor quantifies how distinct pathways communicate through intermediary residues. We apply this framework to analyze the evolutionary adaptation of the PSD95pdz3 domain from Class I to Class II ligand specificity via mutations G330T and H372A. The cooperation index demonstrates a distinct evolutionary hierarchy: the G330T mutation establishes distributed pathway couplings that the H372A mutation subsequently exploits, whereas H372A alone produces minimal global changes. Furthermore, the fourth-order analysis identifies His317 as a critical intermediary node bridging the class-switching (330-372) and class-bridging (330-400) allosteric pathways. These results demonstrate that allosteric dependencies emerge only when mutations accumulate in specific combinations, with a hierarchical organization of pathways structured around position 330 and intermediary nodes His317 and Phe400. Rather than predicting allosteric mechanisms, this framework provides a mechanistic explanation for why and how allostery emerges during protein evolution.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
11.9%
2
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.9%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
7.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.3%
6
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
9
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
18
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
22
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.8%
25
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
27
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%