Back

The effects of force constraint during preparatory phase on the explosive force generation of base stealing in baseball.

Konno, K.; Itaya, A.; Kizuka, T.; Ono, S.

2026-06-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.10.731238 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundExplosive force generation during the initial acceleration phase is critical for successful base stealing in baseball. Preparatory balance control preceding movement onset may facilitate this process by constraining horizontal ground reaction force (GRF) toward a task-specific direction. However, its contribution to ballistic sprint initiation remains unclear. Research questionDoes preparatory force constraint influence explosive force generation during base stealing, and when during the preparatory phase is this influence greatest? MethodsFourteen baseball players performed 3-m maximal sprints simulating base stealing under time-constraint (Time) and self-paced (Self) conditions. GRF around movement onset were recorded. Peak rate of force development (peak RFD) was computed from onset to take-off. A 250-ms window before the onset was divided into 50-ms bins, and mean resultant length (Rlen), which represents the extent of force constraint, of each bin was calculated. Using statistics analyses, Differences between conditions were tested, and the relationship between the interaction (Rlen x condition) and peak RFD was assessed. ResultsThe peak RFD was greater under the Self condition than under the Time condition, accompanied by a larger Rlen. Furthermore, Results indicated that the force constraint in the 150-100 ms interval preceding the movement onset most strongly influenced the peak RFD. SignificanceThese findings demonstrate that temporally organized preparatory force constraint plays a critical role in explosive sprint initiation during base stealing. Identifying the specific preparatory timing linked to superior force production provides novel mechanistic insight into preparatory balance control and may inform targeted training strategies for ballistic athletic movements.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.2%
3
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
4
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
6
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
8
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.5%
10
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
13
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
15
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
27
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
29
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%