Natural Language Processing Based Solution for Labeling Brain Metastasis Identified in Radiology Reports
Liu, T.; Han, Y. T.; Zuo, H.; Das, S.; Lin, H.-M.; Colak, E.; Istasy, M.; Ladak, A. M.; Bigenimana, J. C.; Gondara, L.; Simkin, J.; Lee, J.; Roozbeh, D.; Nichol, A. M.; Easaw, J.; Walker, E.; Yip, S.; Mou, L.; Yuan, Y.
Show abstract
Abstract Purpose: Brain metastases (BM) far exceed primary CNS tumours and constitute the majority workload for neuro-oncology care providers. Currently, the cancer registries only capture synchronous BMs, which is only a small proportion of all BMs. We aim to develop and validate a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm that identifies brain metastases in radiology reports, enabling scalable surveillance of asynchronous BMs. Methods: Using population-based cancer registry data in Alberta, Canada, we identified a cancer cohort diagnosed between 2012--2019 with follow-up to 2022. All brain/head radiology reports at and post-cancer diagnosis were identified. Reports were sampled through a multi-phase approach and manually labeled for BM presence. We trained two Bio_ClinicalBERT models on the "Findings" and "Impressions" sections, respectively, and took the maximum predicted probability as the report-level prediction. Internal and external validation used reports from the Canadian provinces of Alberta, Ontario, and British Columbia. Results: The models were trained on 1,879 samples. For internal validation, 1,833 reports from 357 patients were tested. At a probability threshold of 0.4, the model achieved a sensitivity of 0.888 and precision of 0.499. The ensemble substantially outperformed single-section models, which achieved sensitivities of only 67.8% (Findings) and 74.2% (Impressions). On external validation, sensitivity was 0.918 in Ontario and 0.726 in British Columbia, demonstrating robustness across diverse data distributions. Conclusions: An NLP-based pipeline processing both Findings and Impressions sections has been developed and validated in three Canadian provinces. It meets cancer registry operational requirements and to be implemented into the surveillance workflow in Alberta and British Columbia, providing a foundation for population-level BM surveillance.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adoption of the OMOP CDM for Cancer Research using Real-world Data: Current Status and Opportunities 92%
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 91%
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Classifying HER2 Status in Breast Cancer Immunohistochemistry Slides and Implications for HER2-Low Cases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of Existing and Novel Symptom- and Antigen Testing-Based COVID-19 Case Definitions in a Community Setting 88%
- Augmenting Fact and Date of Death in Electronic Health Records using Internet Media Sources: A Validation Study from Two Large Healthcare Systems 88%
- Obtaining prevalence estimates of COVID-19: A model to inform decision-making 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.