Back

Plasma proteomics reveals clinical and mechanistic heterogeneity among individuals who develop coronary artery disease

Yang, Y.; Tan, D.; Carrasco-Zanini, J.; Su, C.-Y.; Zhou, S.; Koyama, S.; Natarajan, P.; langenberg, C.; Lu, T.; Yoshiji, S.

2026-06-18 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.10.26355410 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals who develop coronary artery disease (CAD) are clinically and mechanistically heterogeneous, and understanding this variation is crucial for precise risk stratification and tailored interventions. However, the molecular mechanisms that connect these two kinds of heterogeneity remain unclear, limiting progress toward biologically grounded risk stratification and targeted interventions. Here, we investigated the heterogeneity of individuals who develop CAD by leveraging plasma proteomic signatures, placed individuals along continuous metabolic gradients and revealed the molecular programs underlying these patterns, thereby linking mechanistic variation to clinical heterogeneity. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 42,803 UK Biobank participants, including 3,713 individuals who developed CAD within 10 years (incident CAD), we first identified a 320-protein panel from 2,923 baseline proteins that improved prediction of incident CAD beyond clinical risk scores. Using reverse graph embedding, we reduced the proteomic data to two dimensions and mapped each incident case onto the resulting two-dimensional latent proteomic space. These proteomic dimensions show significant associations with cardiometabolic and kidney-related clinical markers. The patterns were replicated in the EPIC-Norfolk study. Phenome-wide Cox regression analyses further linked these proteomic dimensions to 10-year incidence rates for various diseases, including type 2 diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, adding the proteomic dimensions to clinical variable-based Cox regression model improved prediction of 10-year incidence of CKD and other diseases, demonstrating the value of proteomic dimensions beyond conventional clinical risk factors. Moreover, individuals with prevalent CAD (diagnosed before proteomic sampling) exhibited high, metabolically adverse dimension values, indicating that these axes capture cumulative metabolic burden. Pathway enrichment analyses implicated altered extracellular matrix organization and immune programs among the proteins contributing to the proteomic dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that plasma proteomic signatures can dissect the heterogeneity of individuals who develop CAD in continuous phenotypic gradients, improve prediction of CAD and comorbidities, and map underlying biological mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 7%
18.8%
2
Nature Metabolism
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
3
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.2%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
8
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
11
Nature Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
14
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
16
Diabetologia
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
71 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
19
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Redox Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
25
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
Circulation Research
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
28
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%