Back

Conversational Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Precision Oncology Reveals Context-Specific TGFβ and JAK/STAT Alterations in Pancreatic Cancer

Diaz, F. C.; Waldrup, B.; Carranza, F. G.; Manjarrez, S.; Velazquez-Villarreal, E.

2026-06-12 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.06.10.26355398 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by extensive molecular complexity, profound stromal remodeling, and limited responsiveness to systemic therapies. Although gemcitabine-based regimens remain widely utilized, the molecular pathways that influence treatment-associated biological variation are incompletely understood. The TGF{beta} and JAK/STAT signaling networks are recognized regulators of tumor progression, immune modulation, and therapeutic resistance; however, their genomic architecture in clinically stratified PDAC populations remains poorly defined. Methods: We employed a conversational artificial intelligence-driven analytical framework to investigate TGF{beta} and JAK/STAT pathway alterations in a cohort of 184 PDAC patients. Clinical and molecular data were integrated to generate age- and treatment-stratified cohorts, enabling pathway-level and gene-level analyses according to gemcitabine exposure. Findings generated through AI-assisted interrogation were subsequently evaluated using conventional statistical approaches. Results: TGF{beta} pathway alterations were identified in approximately one-quarter to one-third of tumors across clinical subgroups and demonstrated relatively stable frequencies regardless of age at diagnosis or gemcitabine treatment status. Gene-level analyses revealed that pathway disruption was predominantly driven by recurrent alterations in SMAD4, with additional low-frequency events involving TGFBR1 and TGFBR2. Notably, TGFBR2 mutations were significantly more frequent among late-onset PDAC patients receiving gemcitabine compared with untreated late-onset patients (8.8% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.04), suggesting a potential treatment-associated enrichment. In contrast, JAK/STAT pathway alterations were rare throughout the cohort, with only isolated mutations observed in pathway components including JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, STAT1, STAT3, and related regulatory genes. No significant differences in JAK/STAT alteration frequencies were identified according to age or treatment exposure. Conclusions: TGF{beta} and JAK/STAT pathways exhibit distinct genomic architectures in PDAC. TGF{beta} pathway disruption represents a recurrent feature of disease biology, largely driven by SMAD4 alterations, while TGFBR2 enrichment in gemcitabine-treated late-onset tumors suggests a potential context-specific association worthy of further investigation. Conversely, genomic alterations within the JAK/STAT pathway are uncommon, indicating that pathway activity may be regulated predominantly through non-genomic mechanisms. These findings demonstrate the utility of conversational artificial intelligence agents for rapid, scalable, and clinically contextualized pathway interrogation and support future studies integrating multi-omic data to refine precision medicine strategies in PDAC.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
3
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
7
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
14
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
18
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
27
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%