Back

Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect of Aspirin and Clinically Significant Bleeding in Older Adults

Tzimas, G.; Tchoua, R. B.; Vanghelof, J. C.; Wolfe, R. C.; Cloud, G.; Mahady, S.; Du, L.; Ernst, M. E.; Wood, E. M.; Raicu, D. S.; Ket, S.; Shah, R. C.

2026-06-12 hematology
10.64898/2026.06.10.26355385 medRxiv
Show abstract

Aim: The global population of older adults is growing, and older age is linked to higher bleeding risk. Although guidelines discourage aspirin for primary prevention in healthy older adults due to bleeding harms outweighing benefits, many continue taking it without a clear indication. It remains unclear whether all older adults face uniform aspirin-related bleeding risk or if certain subgroups are more vulnerable. Methods: We analyzed data from 19,114 ASPREE trial participants to develop machine learning models using 116 baseline variables. Random forest (RF) and random survival forest (RSF) models predicted 5-year bleeding risk, and participants were stratified into low, intermediate, and high-risk groups based on the 20th and 80th percentiles of predicted risk. We assessed heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) by testing treatment-by-risk group interactions on the relative scale using Fine-Gray models, and on the absolute scale using observed 5-year cumulative incidence rates. Results: Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 626 major bleeding events occurred. The RF model had moderate discrimination (AUC = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.63-0.67) and good calibration (Brier = 0.032, 95% CI: 0.029-0.034). Statistically significant HTE was observed on the relative scale, with the greatest relative increase in bleeding risk seen in the low-risk group (subdistribution hazard ratio = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.27-4.01). On the absolute scale, low-risk participants experienced higher bleeding with aspirin (absolute risk difference (ARD) = 1.17%, 95% CI: 0.37-1.95), but heterogeneity in ARDs was not statistically significant (Cochran's Q p > 0.45). Similar findings were observed when using the RSF model. Conclusion: Participants at lowest baseline bleeding risk experienced the greatest relative increase in bleeding risk with aspirin therapy. We found statistically significant heterogeneity in treatment effects on the relative but not absolute scale. These findings support an individualized, risk-based approach to aspirin therapy decision-making in older adults.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
20.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.6%
3
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
4
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.5%
6
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
14
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
15
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
20
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%