Back

Parent and physiotherapist perceptions about movement skills of young children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Letts, E.; Herrington, J.; Batthish, M.; Bedard, C.; Bremer, E.; Gorter, J. W.; King-Dowling, S.; Obeid, J.

2026-06-11 rheumatology
10.64898/2026.06.10.26355384 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: The onset of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in the early years ([≤]5 years) may negatively impact movement skill (encompassing related concepts of gross motor skills, fundamental movement skills, and functional ability) development. Few studies have explored the perceptions and needs of parents and physiotherapists towards children's difficulty with these movement skills, essential to identify potential areas for added support. The objective of this study is to understand the perceptions of physiotherapists and parents towards movement skills of children with JIA. Methods: Seventeen parents and 24 physiotherapists completed an online questionnaire consisting of multiple choice and open-ended questions about the movement skills of young children with JIA. Demographic and multiple choice questions were quantitively analysed using descriptive statistics. Open-ended responses were analyzed using qualitative conventional content analysis. Results: About half (47%) of parents perceived their children to have movement difficulties, and 75% of physiotherapists described the movement skills of children with JIA as worse than other children of the same age. Our qualitative analysis revealed three general themes including: functional task difficulties; clinical variability in movement skills; and psychosocial components of movement skill difficulties. Conclusion: This study provides an analysis of perceptions of physiotherapists and parents towards the movement skills of young children with JIA. A significant proportion of parents and physiotherapists identify movement difficulties among children with JIA that impact daily life. Future interventions co-designed with both parents and care providers targeting movement skills are needed.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
39.4%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
RMD Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
6
Rheumatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
7
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
13
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
14
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
17
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
22
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%