Back

Cancer care disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A sequential mixed-methods study

Timilshina, N.; Jacobson, D.; Birze, A.; Wodchis, W. P.; Kuluski, K.; Strumpf, E.; Ammi, M.

2026-06-12 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.06.10.26355360 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly disrupted healthcare delivery worldwide, with cancer care among the most affected services. Prior studies documented delays in referrals, reduced specialist access, and increased provider burden. However, the extent to which these experiences were reflected at the system level remains unclear. Objective To document cancer care experiences and examine whether these experiences were reflected in population-level health system indicators across Ontario, Canada. Methods We used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. Qualitative data were collected through focus groups and semi-structured interviews with 32 participants, including patients with cancer (n=8), caregivers (n=5), healthcare providers (n=14), and decision-makers (n=5) across two hospital settings in Ontario, Canada. Emergent themes informed the development of quantitative indicators. We then conducted a retrospective population-based analysis of linked administrative health databases for cancer patients in Ontario (n=87,786) to assess the prevalence of identified themes. Results Four themes emerged: (I) delays in diagnosis and screening; (II) disrupted access to primary care; (III) barriers to specialist and mental health services; and (IV) fragmented care for patients with multimorbidity. Quantitative findings corroborated major themes. Screening rates declined for cervical (64.8% to 57.5%) and breast cancer (64.5% to 57.2%). While in-person primary care shifted almost entirely to virtual modalities (8.5% to 95.4%), overall visit volumes remained stable. Specialist care showed uneven patterns, with increased oncology visits but declines in cardiology and mental health services. Patients with multiple comorbidities experienced the largest reductions in non-oncology specialist care. Conclusion The pandemic disrupted key components of cancer care, particularly screening, access to certain specialist services, and care for patients with complex needs. Integrating qualitative and quantitative evidence highlights areas of system vulnerability and underscores the need for coordinated, resilient cancer care capable of maintaining essential services during future crises.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.4%
6
CMAJ Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
10
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
14
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
17
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
20
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
21
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
24
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%