"We don't complain; it's just part of being a woman": frequency, knowledge, and sociocultural beliefs about dysmenorrhoea in a South African university cohort

Introduction Dysmenorrhoea is highly prevalent globally and interferes with engagement in education, work, social participation, and quality of life. Although evidence suggests that sociocultural beliefs influence how menstrual pain is understood and managed, relatively little research has explored dysmenorrhoea-related knowledge and beliefs within South Africa. This study aimed to (1) determine the frequency of dysmenorrhoea, (2) assess dysmenorrhoea-related knowledge and compare knowledge between menstruating and non-menstruating individuals, and (3) explore commonly held generational, cultural, and religious beliefs related to dysmenorrhoea in a South African university cohort. Methods We analysed data collected as part of a cross-sectional survey conducted among staff and students at a South African university. Participants completed demographic questions, items assessing dysmenorrhoea-related knowledge, and an adapted Working Ability, Location, Intensity, Days of Pain, Dysmenorrhoea (WaLIDD) questionnaire. Participants were also invited to provide free-text responses describing generational, cultural, and religious beliefs about dysmenorrhoea. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and compared between menstruating and non-menstruating participants. Free-text responses were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results A total of 863 participants completed the survey, including 578 current or past menstruators. The frequency (95%CI) of dysmenorrhoea was 75.4% (71.7-78.9). Most participants were classified as having moderate (53%) or severe (31%) dysmenorrhoea on the WaLIDD scale. Awareness of dysmenorrhoea was higher among participants who had menstruated than among those who had never menstruated (80.4% vs 55.3%, p<0.001). Most participants (85.1%) reported wanting more education about dysmenorrhoea and its impact. Reflexive thematic analysis of 246 free-text responses identified five themes: (1) menstrual pain is normalised, dismissed, and expected to endure, (2) reproductive meanings attached to menstrual pain, (3) moral, spiritual, and cultural interpretations of menstrual pain, (4) negotiating competing explanations for menstrual pain, and (5) managing and controlling menstrual pain symptoms. Across themes, dysmenorrhoea was interpreted through social, cultural, reproductive, spiritual, and biomedical frameworks that shaped how pain was understood, communicated, and managed. Conclusion Dysmenorrhoea is common in this South African university cohort, and is rarely understood as a purely biological symptom. Instead, menstrual pain is understood and managed through broader social, cultural, reproductive, moral, and biomedical narratives, which shape how pain is recognised, disclosed, legitimised, and treated. These findings highlight the importance of considering sociocultural beliefs alongside clinical factors when developing menstrual health education, support strategies, and healthcare services.