Back

Effects of Left Atrial Wall Thickness on Myocardial Mechanics and Blood Dynamics using Multiscale Modeling

Gan, B.; Shi, L.; Chen, I. Y.; Vedula, V.

2026-06-12 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.09.731221 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePatient-specific models of left atrial (LA) mechanics often assume uniform left atrial wall thickness (LAWT), but the effect of LAWT on the mechanics and hemodynamics remains less quantified. MethodsFour LA myocardium models were built from gated CTA images: a baseline variable thickness (VT#0), two reduced-dilation variants, and a 2mm uniform thickness model. Multi-scale mechanics and blood flow simulations were performed across all the thickness variants using model parameters personalized on the baseline model. Predicted displacements, wall stresses and strains, and hemodynamics were compared. ResultsAcross all LAWT variants, myocardial volume spanned 14.4-19.9mL (38%), while cavity volume remained mostly within 5% of image data throughout the cardiac cycle. Circulatory system output, myocardial displacements, and strains varied by 5-6% relative to the baseline model. Instantaneous stresses increased by up to 19% in the thinner variable thickness models and decreased by up to 16% in the uniformly thick case. Globally, the area under low time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) varied between 23% and 30% across all thickness variants, while LA exposed to elevated oscillatory shear index (OSI) increased from nearly 6% to 19%. Over 90% of LAA was exposed to low shear, but the high-OSI area increased from 7% in VT#0 to over 30% in Uniform. ConclusionA personalized multiscale modeling framework was leveraged to demonstrate that the left atrial myocardial stresses and oscillatory shear had a greater sensitivity to local wall thickness representation compared to cavity volumes, tissue displacements, strains, and mean blood shear.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
2
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.9%
5
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
9
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
10
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
11
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
12
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
17
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
22
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%