Back

Automated Segmentation of Brainstem and Subcortical White Matter: Mapping the Deep Tegmental Core with BundleParc

Schilling, K. G.; Rudravaram, G.; Theberge, A.; Amandola, M.; Kim, M. E.; Humphreys, K. L.; Cutting, L.; Archer, D.; Hohman, T. J.; Jefferson, A. L.; Beason Held, L. L.; Bilgel, M.; Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, ; The BIOCARD Study Team, ; Chamberland, M.; Descoteaux, M.; Petit, L.; Rheault, F.; Landman, B. A.

2026-06-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.09.731210 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diffusion MRI enables noninvasive mapping of human white matter pathways, but automated segmentation methods have largely focused on large association, projection, and commissural bundles. Brainstem and subcortical pathways supporting basal ganglia, cerebellar, limbic/reward, sensory, and homeostatic functions remain underrepresented in large-scale connectomic analyses. To address this gap, we adapted BundleParc, a recently introduced bundle-parcellation architecture, into an automated pipeline for direct segmentation and along-tract parcellation of 97 subcortical and brainstem white matter pathways. The model was trained on a curated reference dataset derived from Human Connectome Project diffusion MRI using anatomy-guided tractography, explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, automated outlier filtering, and manual quality assurance. Operating directly on native-space fiber orientation distributions, the algorithm successfully recovers these intricate anatomical trajectories and ordered parcellations. We show the model generalizes to diverse external datasets spanning development, aging, and neurodegenerative disease cohorts, maintaining robust performance across variations in spatial resolution and angular sampling. The released container, trained model, population atlas, reference streamlines, and quality assurance outputs provide a resource for studying deep brainstem and subcortical pathways in development, aging, disease, and neuromodulation-relevant anatomy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.