Back

Conserved Cell Type Signatures Across the Brainstem and Spinal Cord in the Mouse Central Nervous System

Gao, Y.; Kegeles, E.; Xie, J.; Lee, C.; Kong, Y.; McClelland, S.; Schmitz, M. T.; Johansen, N. J.; Baka, J.; Casper, T.; Clark, M.; Fancher, K. A.; Gloe, J.; Goldy, J.; Guzman, J.; Halterman, C.; Ho, W.; Hooper, M.; Jin, K.; Jungert, M.; McCue, R.; Pena, N.; Phillips, E.; Ruiz, A.; Shapovalova, N. V.; Sokolovsky, D.; Thomas, E. D.; Torkelson, A.; Yang, R.; Yu, S.; Dee, N.; Smith, K. A.; Bakken, T. E.; Tasic, B.; He, Z.; Zeng, H.; Yao, Z.; van Velthoven, C. T. J.

2026-06-11 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.09.728039 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how cell types are organized across the central nervous system (CNS) is key to uncovering neural function. Here, we integrate single-nucleus Multiome (RNA+ATAC) sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and computational analyses to map conserved cell type signatures in the adult mouse brainstem and spinal cord. We identify a shared core of neuronal and non-neuronal cell types, alongside region-specific specializations reflecting distinct functions. Spatial data reveal conserved cellular niches across the brainstem-spinal cord boundary, indicating a continuous organizational logic. Cross-region comparisons uncover recurrent gene expression modules and signaling programs that may support shared circuit features. Chromatin accessibility profiling highlights cell-type-specific regulatory programs and implicates Hox transcription factors in positional identity. Notably, cell-type and positional identities are largely orthogonal, with varying regional influence across neuronal classes: motor neurons show strong positional coupling, whereas glutamatergic and GABAergic interneurons show minimal entrainment. This work provides a reference for the shared molecular architecture of these CNS regions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.