Electrical signatures of divergent connectivity in the human subgenual cingulate cortex
Qianq, Z.; Kerezoudis, P.; Gregg, N.; Hermes, D.; Klassen, B. T.; Chari, A.; Tisdall, M. M.; Baker, M. R.; Miller, K. J.
Show abstract
Background: Major depressive disorder remains a leading cause of disability. While subgenual cingulate cortex (sgCC) deep brain stimulation (DBS) shows promise for medically refractory depression, clinical outcomes have been heterogeneous, suggesting that individual differences in neural circuitry engagement may critically influence therapeutic efficacy. We aimed to define the electrophysiological signatures of sgCC efferent connectivity using single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) with intracranial stereo-EEG (sEEG) to inform rational targeting and physiological biomarkers for sgCC-DBS. Methods: In four patients undergoing clinically indicated sEEG for seizure mapping, SPES was delivered through sgCC pairs, while distributed brain stimulation-evoked potentials (BSEPs) were recorded across cortical and subcortical sites. Responses were characterized using Canonical Response Parameterization to extract reproducible waveforms and per-trial reliability. Results: sgCC stimulation elicited reproducible, spatially organized BSEPs across frontal, limbic, and paralimbic networks, aligning with known anatomical pathways. Frontal recruitment featured robust, lateralized orbitofrontal activation favoring the ipsilateral central, medial OFC and bilateral ventromedial prefrontal responses. Limbic effects demonstrated bilateral cingulate activation with stronger ipsilateral recruitment and lateralized amygdala and hippocampal responses. Paralimbic engagement included insular responses with subject-specific anterior predominance and bi-hemispheric temporal-polar slow-wave deflections. Conclusion: These findings provide direct electrophysiological evidence of distributed, lateralized sgCC divergent network connectivity in the human brain, offering physiologic confirmation of its role in affective circuitry. The observed topography and laterality have direct applications for sgCC-DBS targeting and implicate BSEP signatures as candidate biomarkers to guide patient-specific therapy.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Biomarker-guided neuromodulation aids memory in traumatic brain injury 95%
- Simultaneous stereo-EEG and high-density scalp EEG recordings to study the effects of intracerebral stimulation parameters 94%
- The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Interoceptive Processing is Modulated by Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression 95%
- Reduction in left frontal alpha oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation in major depressive disorder is context-dependent in a randomized-clinical trial 94%
- Hypoactivation of ventromedial frontal cortex in major depressive disorder: an MEG study of the Reward Positivity 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Networks and genes modulated by posterior hypothalamic stimulation in patients with aggressive behaviours: Analysis of probabilistic mapping, normative connectomics, and atlas-derived transcriptomics of the largest international multi-centre dataset 96%
- Distinct population and single-neuron selectivity for executive and episodic processing in human dorsal posterior cingulate 94%
- Cortical excitability controls the strength of mental imagery 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic Causal Tractography Analysis of Auditory Descriptive Naming:An Intracranial Study of 106 Patients 94%
- Glutamate-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (GluCEST) Detects Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Motor Cortex 93%
- tDCS modulates effective connectivity during motor command following; a potential therapeutic target for disorders of consciousness 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.