Estimating COVID-19 Cumulative Incidence from Seroprevalence Surveys accounting for Time-Varying Seroreversion: A Fully Bayesian Methodology
Owusu-Boaitey, N.; Meyer, M. J.; Herrera-Esposito, D.; Bottcher, L.; Lukz, M.; Cook, S.; Stoto, M. A.; Kraemer, J. D.
Show abstract
Seroprevalence surveys reveal the extent of humoral immunity against pathogens such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and under some circumstances represent cumulative incidence of prior infection. However, antibody waning - or seroreversion - biases these estimates by reducing assay sensitivity in a time-varying manner. Because assay sensitivity decays over time, naively using serosurveys can substantially bias estimates of SARS-CoV-2 cumulative incidence and fatality rates. The Bayesian assay-specific, time-varying sensitivity adjustment developed in this paper can reliably correct for this bias and account for the delay between infection and serosurvey. In seroprevalence studies conducted in the United States in 2020, adjusting for time-varying sensitivity increased cumulative incidence by up to 1.4-fold, with an adjustment of 1.08 for a national study. Our estimates contrast with a previously published 2-fold adjustment that did not account for assay design. This suggests that previous analyses overestimated cumulative incidence by applying seroreversion corrections that did not account for assay-specific effects, or underestimated cumulative incidence by not applying seroreversion corrections. These biases imply fatality rate underestimation and overestimation, respectively. Our model provides a framework for design-specific time-varying sensitivity corrections in seroprevalence surveys for other pathogens.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating vaccine efficacy against transmission via effect on viral load 93%
- Estimating the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the infection fatality ratio in light of waning antibodies 92%
- Understanding the net benefit of antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19: An enhanced decision-curve analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining antibody markers for serosurveillance of SARS-CoV-2 to estimate seroprevalence and time-since-infection 93%
- Annual risk of hepatitis E virus infection and seroreversion: insights from a serological cohort in Sitakunda, Bangladesh 93%
- Inferring the proportion of undetected cholera infections from serological and clinical surveillance in an immunologically naive population 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adjusting COVID-19 seroprevalence survey results to account for test sensitivity and specificity 95%
- Misclassification of yellow fever vaccination status revealed through hierarchical Bayesian modeling 94%
- Performance of Existing and Novel Symptom- and Antigen Testing-Based COVID-19 Case Definitions in a Community Setting 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- High variability in transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within households and implications for control 94%
- Estimating Force of Infection from Serologic Surveys with Imperfect Tests 94%
- Factors influencing SARS-CoV-2 IgG test sensitivity: A Bayesian analysis of seroconversion and reversion by time since infection, test, age and disease severity. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.