Back

Impact of the disposable vape ban in Great Britain: a representative interrupted time-series study 2022-2026

Tattan-Birch, H.; Jackson, S. E.; Buss, V. H.; Cox, S.; Shahab, L.; Kock, L.; Bauld, L.; Brown, J.

2026-06-17 health policy
10.64898/2026.06.09.26355241 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: To examine changes in vaping and smoking trends following the announcement and implementation of the disposable vape ban in Great Britain. Design: Interrupted time-series analysis of representative monthly cross-sectional data from the Smoking Toolkit Study. Setting: Great Britain. Participants: 118,946 adults ([≥]16y), including 12,042 young adults (16-24y), surveyed between Jan-2022 and Feb-2026. Main outcome measures: Changes in trends in disposable vape use among vapers, and current vaping and smoking prevalence, using seasonally-adjusted generalised additive models with comparisons against a no-ban counterfactual in which pre-announcement trends continued unchanged. Results: The proportion of vapers mainly using disposable devices began to decline following the announcement of the ban in Jan-2024, with the fall accelerating after implementation in June-2025. By Feb-2026, 5.6% (95%CI 4.6-6.9) of adult vapers and 7.1% (5.1-10.1) of young adult vapers mainly used disposables, compared with 62.0% (53.6-71.8) and 63.6% (52.7-76.7), respectively, under a no-ban counterfactual. Increases in vaping prevalence slowed post-announcement and plateaued post-implementation; by Feb-2026, prevalence was lower than the no-ban counterfactual in adults (13.6% v 18.8%; difference -5.2 percentage points, 95%CI -7.1 to -3.3) and young adults (27.8% v 39.1%; -11.3, -18.6 to -4.1). Declines in smoking prevalence stalled among adults and reversed among young adults post-announcement, before shifting downward again post-implementation; by Feb-2026, smoking prevalence was similar to the no-ban counterfactual in adults (difference +0.9 percentage points, -0.5 to +2.2) but possibly higher in young adults (+3.3, -0.5 to +7.1). Conclusions: The disposable vape ban in Great Britain was associated with substantial changes after both announcement and implementation, including a marked reduction in disposable vape use and a slowing then plateauing of growth in overall vaping prevalence. However, declines in smoking also temporarily slowed--and among young adults, reversed--after the announcement, before downward trends resumed after implementation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Addiction
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
3
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
International Journal of Drug Policy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Journal of Public Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Eurosurveillance
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
11
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
20
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%