Back

Automated Airways Characterization and Assessment of Cystic Fibrosis from CT Imaging

Chong Chie, J. A. K. H.; Cooper, M. L.; Persohn, S. A.; Burton, C. P.; Salama, P.; Territo, P. R.

2026-06-18 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.09.26355170 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Advancements in medical imaging have enabled non-invasive diagnosis and staging of cystic fibrosis (CF) using CT scans, revealing dilated airways, an increased number of visible airways, and airway generation splits in these patients. However, manual characterization of airways remains time-consuming and challenging due to the numerous structural changes, thereby limiting clinical feasibility. This study aims to develop an automated algorithm to characterize airways from segmented lung CT scans and apply this to a retrospective population. This approach reduces the time required to analyze images and obtain disease-staging results. Methods This framework consists of two stages. The first stage extracts and skeletonizes the airway tree from lung CTs, while the second stage measures lung features, including airway volumes, branch counts, generation splits, diameters, and cross-sectional areas. This permits comprehensive characterization for use in clinical assessment. Results The airways analysis was performed on 169 CT volumes ranging in age from 6 to 18 years of age, revealing substantial differences in detected airway branches, generation splits, and normalized airway volume between the control and CF groups. The framework also measures airway diameters and cross-sectional areas, revealing an increase in the number of small airways in cystic fibrosis patients, due to early bronchiectasis. These findings align with previous research and demonstrate the framework's ability to accurately quantify airway changes in patients with CF. Discussion The framework extracts entire airway trees, facilitating measurements of volume, branch count, diameters, and cross-sectional areas, which change with CF severity and/or treatment. However, partial lung atelectasis can limit the accuracy of airway detection in moderate-to-severe cases. Funding NIA U54 AG054345 and NIA R21 AG07857501

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 9%
19.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 1%
15.7%
3
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
4
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
5
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
6
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
8
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
10
Rheumatology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
12
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
20
Respiratory Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%